IS THERE A PART OF "NO RISK" THAT YOU ARE HAVING A PROBLEM UNDERSTANDING? GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZ...WHAT DOES IT TAKE?
what it means is that this has been discussed soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many times on this forum that you can look it up in the archives and read the replies that have been given!
hi teak wat if the condom had fluids on or blood onafter intercourse, then she sucked penis with condom on putting fluids/blood in her mouth,then sucked my penis immediatly unprotected then would this change risk or not and any reasons whynot. many thanks
i think that is what you were told from the start :)
bottom line is no risk then.
the facts are...
hiv is transmitted through unprotected vaginal/anal intercourse
sharing of iv drug works
mother to child
hiv is NOT transmitted from the manner that you have described about...no ifs, ands, or buts about it.
i agree with the FACTS!!!
i take it you agree with teak then that no risk from this exposure regardless of possible fluids on condom then to her mouth to penis thanks
IF THERE WAS A REASON FOR YOU TO TEST...a test at 3 months IS CONCLUSIVE
hi after reading many of your answers to people you always quote 12 wks conclusive is that 100% or could it take longer thanks
thanks for your quick response what if there was any vaginal fluids on condom after it had been inside of her thanks