Go into the Expert forum every Dr here says they have never seen, heard or read of a convincing case of HIV from oral sex. And even if it was a risk it would make more sense that the person giving oral sex would be the one at risk since that person would be getting the ejaculate. But anyway either way is not a risk.
Dr.K from SF also did a study that was very good. Gay men in SF...no new HIV from oral sex.
Understood!
I have read through the studies, esp the Spanish one which sounds pretty convincing. But one thought nagged at my mind, although the couples are serodiscordant, the person with HIV IS receiving treatment and probably would have a pretty low viral load. This would in turn mean that the risk of transmitting HIV is also very much reduced.
Also, I noticed that there are very few couples with females having HIV and with the males without HIV.
Sorry for continuously asking. I am not trying to pick holes, sound like a smart *** or be annoying. Please understand I am just anxious.
I do realize that oral sex is very common, and convincing evidence would have emerged that it can transmit HIV if it really can. It's just that like what some researchers have stated, it is very difficult to take out those who only engage in oral sex vs those who had oral sex plus anal / vaginal sex.
Thanks again Vance.
Thanks Vance for the swift reply. I am not too sure about the difference between 'documented' and 'reported'.
CDC uses a conservate estimate because of "reported" cases. There however have not been any "documanted" cases. And several studies show that oral sex is not a risk. Also salvia has proteins and enzymes that render the virus inactive.
Documented is usually done from an active study. So when a study is done they might follow around a group of people and they will test and ask risks. Well in 2 studies oral sex was the only "risk" and no one aquired HIV when they had just done oral sex.