If you believe you have been exposed to HIV and want help to judge your risk, would like advice about HIV testing, or have questions about the effectiveness of condoms or risks associated with specific sexual practices, this is the site for you.
Because the test manufacturers and the CDC say 3 months which many will say allows a lot of room for error so it had a lot of padding room in it and is on the conservative side. Like i am sure you have seen the docs say already, they have yet to see a 6 week negative go positive later on.
I know. I was just reading different posts and some of they share different info. Like the post on your thread, stating the week testing timetable. 6 week at 99%. But the docs saying 12 week 99.9%. And the whole Massachuets 6 week conclusive...? crazy.
The problem is that most people who turn HIV positive have had multiple exposures, so it's very difficult to nail down the exact time they were infected.
Also, in the beginning, tests were not nearly as sensitive as they are now.
Over time we've been able to find out that the 6 month and then 3 month estimates are quite a bit off from reality...Especially now with modern testing. But changing people's mindset of the time frame is very difficult to achieve.
If you've got a 6 week negative, you don't have HIV.
And you are trying to differentiate a difference of less than 1 percentage point, which is nothing in the scheme of things. Bottom line when you get confused and want to jumble numbers, rather than play stats just follow the CDC guildeline of 3 month conclusive. That makes it easy.
so i am in boston on business and I am having huge issues coming to terms with the fact that I am hiv- as I have symptoms like you wont belive. So i call teh state AIDS hotline... ghet asked loads of questions about exposure ect ect .... the call handler (who was fantastic) says my 6 week test was conclusive and my 13 week test just confirms it..... she said tests today are SO sensetive you get false positives but NEVER a false negative.. This was Boston though....
The CDC site claims that people can seroconvert after six weeks, any time up to six months. An infectious disease specialist I spoke to about my own risky encounter told me that a six-week negative means nothing, although everyone else has told me he was wrong. Regardless, it seems that with the increased sensitivity of newer tests, along with what most doctors, including the doctors in the forums here say, seroconversion after six weeks must be very rare, although according to the CDC it is not impossible. I would always test out to three months just to be certain, but if you have a six-week negative, you should not be nervous while you wait for the three-month test.
My situation is an unprotected sex event that happened on Jan.3rd 2008. I tested March 26th 2008, NEGATIVE! but had a razor blade cut on my arm, and tested 6 1/2 weeks after just in case there was infected blood on it. And that would make both situations 18 1/2 weeks from sex, and 6 1/2 weeks form cut test was NEGATIVE.
This is why I wonder about the 6 week negative result....
If you had a negative text on March 26 after having unprotected sex January 3, you are fine. That is precisely 12 weeks. Your razor blade cut was never a risk; thus, it should not factor into the equation. Your only risk was unprotected sex. Congratulations, you are negative. Next time use protection.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.