Well, the truth is, if you have had unprotected vaginal or anal sex with someone *known* to have HIV, some doctors are going to recommend testing out to 6 months, just to be extra sure that you are indeed not infected.
I believe that the odds are a little lower than the previous poster suggested, but, in any event, they are still very much in your favor (if the scenario I described above applies to you). If you have tested negative at 12 weeks, there is no reason to believe that you will not do so at 6 months.
The window period is confusing, to be sure, and much of it is based on guestimates of the odds that you may have contracted HIV. A majority of the posters on this site had little to no risk of having done so, so the doc in the moderated forum says that a 6 week test is fine. For those with higher risk, I am sure he would say test out to 12 weeks (well, not sure, actually - perhaps he wouldn't). Not sure if he would suggest testing out to 6 months.
It seems to me that this might be a good question for Doc H in the moderated forum. My advice would to lay out your situation and ask the same question there as you asked here.
Good luck to you, and take care of yourself.
Hi Dave. Why don't you explain exactly what happened first. TO answer your question, the average window period is about 4-6 weeks. Now this being said, it means that "most" people will have a positive antibody test about 4-6 weeks after a known exposure if in fact they were infected with the virus. Six months is definitely not the norm. I got tested at 12 weeks and I felt very confident with my negative results. Also, it's important to note that, for example, if you had unprotected vaginal sex with a girl who was HIV+, then your chances of acquiring HIV from this one time encounter would be 1 in 20,000. That being said, don't stress out have take a test at 6 weeks. Happy holidays!