Hello and thanks for taking my question. After Dr. Enriquez-Sarano's new study came out a few weeks ago, I was encouraged to get a new echo to get measurements as per that study. After all, I am asymptomatic, 35 year old male, with MVP and almost severe MR. I seemed to be the exact kind of person this study was speaking of. My meausrements were as follows:
.37 cm2 ERO by the flow convergence method.
Prominent late systolic billowing if both leaflets consistent with MVP.
3-4+ (near severe MR) mid-late systolic MR.
1+ Tricuspid Regrurg.
Mildly dilated Aortic Root (4.2)
LA = 3.5
EF = 60%
LVIDd= 5.5
LVIDs = 3.7
Trileaflet Arotic Valve
All else is normal - normal estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure too.
I seem to be pretty close to the magic 40 number for the ERO from the article, although my heart size seems good for now. Via email and only having only the same info I am sharing here, Dr. Sarano said I was "not so bad" and I should be revaluated in a year. To me, .37cm2 seems really close to .40 cm2. About how long will it take to go 3 more square millimeters to where surgery will be more pressing (if there is even an answer to that)? I know that surgery is in my future, my the when part is still at issue. Many thanks again!