My husband had a heart attack while we were on vacation in April of 1999. We were air-vaced to Puerto Rico where they put in 3 stents. When we got back to our home in St. Louis my husband visited a cardiologist who reviewed his charts and saw no problem. In turn he began to have some symptoms of angina in August and the cardiologist put him through all the non-evasive test pronouncing him in great shape. My husband continued to be concerned with the angina and the doctor said the last test to give my husband piece of mind was an angiogram but it would be up to my husband. We elected to have the invasive procedure done at once. The angiogram was done at 7:00AM and within two hours the cardiologist came out and said my husband was a walking time bomb. That the stents have grown scar tissue and the best solution was a by-pass. He had the bypass at 12:00 that day. This was in September 1999. While he always said he didn't want bypass surgery it was the best solution for him. He was not a good candidate for stents. We are members of a support group called Mended Hearts and we were surprised to learn how many stents don't succeed. Many people, unfortunately are not candidates for by-pass surgery so stents and angioplasty are wonderful alternates. But if you are other wise in good health and follow doctors advice a bypass could be the best thing that could happen for clogged arteries. I hope this has help. Usually a good cardiologist is more interested in quality of life for his patients rather than covering his overhead.
I would suggest getting another opinion.
Angiogram $ drive their businesses and doctors appointments provide very little $. Some are highly incentivised to get you in that cath lab or through their bypass factory and their best medical opinion is sometimes clouded by that.
You had a heart attack and it is going to take some time to heal.
Thank you very much Bill. I do appreciate your suggestion.
Wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
PS: I called again today for my 2 day Sestabibi (test done on Dec. 7 and Dec. 8) report and as yet I have not got them!! I wonder why the delay...
1. No.
2. It sounds like a very abnormal stress test. If accurate, it means that you probably should not wait for the catheterization.
3.Nothing that is proven.
4.Radiation treatments are the only approved treatment that appear to effect restenosis, but long term risks are unknown.
5.Currently, there is a role for both angioplasty and bypass surgery. At least 50% of angioplasty patients never need bypass surgery and thus angioplasty saves these patients the risk, inconvenience, pain and expense of surgery. Patients with extensive blockages and/or multiple restenosis are very likely to need surgery, but at least angioplasty postpones surgery in these patients also, such that hopefully they will need only one surgery to get them through their lifetime.
6.You could ask your caridologist, though he may be unwilling to share the specifics with you. This minimum volume data is controversial. I think it is more important to pick a good hospital than to focus on the individual cardiologist.
7. Most cardiologists focus on the technology driven aspects of care. This is probably one reason why cardiac care has improved so dramatically in the USA. Truthfully, the role of stress has been overrated in importance, at least as far as chronic coronary artery disease is concerned.
8. No specific recommendations. The transradial approach is good when it works, not well-suited for complex cases though.