My guess is that there was something wrong with how the machine was functioning.
I called my GP and she got her info from someone on staff and I talked directly with the Cardiologist. The GP called the Cardiologist and he told her that it was artifacts most likely just caused by something with the machine. He doesn't want to redo the 24 hour so we'll go for the 30 day.
I just wish I could take a deep breath and not over react all the time.
Thanks for your advice everyone.
Resting
I'm with Jenny, sounds like they were looking at two different reports.
Thats really funny that your doctor had one result and the cardio another? I would call your regular doctor back and ask them to find out what is going on, because maybe there is a mix up on reports. Not sure how it works everywhere else, but here, if there is a problem, your gp gets that word also.
The automatic summary are more "skeptic" than the manual review, as I understand it. It often counts ordinary beats as PACs (as it's just a formula deciding, in example "20% or more earlier than expected"). It often (always) counts PACs with abberancy as PVCs. It basicly count every heartbeat with a QRS wider than xxx msec as PVCs. I have borderline wide QRS complexes and the stupid machine counted parts of my Holter as AIVR even if P waves were present.
Anyway, if the machine counted 104 as highest heart rate, it probably is. There is a possibility there was a very short run at 150, (a triplet or something) though. But I support your conclusion, most likely two different reports.