The opposite assumption, that the HAP drug might actually interfere with the IFn gamma activity is also supported by the presentation, in that the core attachment to the epigenetic loaded cccDNA molecule is somehow needed to activate the dismantlement of the cccDNA. Thus a net antagonistic effect is also possible.
There is a contradiction in these effects, that is not easily resolved by looking at the details given, unfortunately.
It is interesting to see that a HP drug is now actually been tested in China. Bayer had these drugs for a long long time since the middle 1990s. It was said that development was halted due to toxicity problems.
From the more detailed mechanisms by which the core half or totally assembled particle exerts its effect in the nucleus onto interferon sensitive genes and as an enhancer of cccDNA expression, it makes sense to assume that reducing the ISG suppressive effects, combined with a reduction in cccDNA activity will act synergistically with interferon gamma, when the core structure is inhibited and possibly distorted by HAP drugs.
anti PD-1 or any therapy that aims to reduce the fundamentally important inhibitory effects on T cell activity can quickly escalate into global Tcell activation, an extremely dangerous situation. One has to realize how powerful and destructive Tcells can be and keeping them in control is paramount to prevent runaway destructive effects on organ function.
If such therapies can be tailored to just partially lift that Tcell control remains to be seen. If it is not specific for the Tcells that are needed to fight HBV, but for any Tcell then i cannot imagine that this is feasible.
i add to this, anti pd-L1 treatment is available in private clinics in germany and being used for cancers.
do we have any data on its safety on hbv when hbvdna is undetectable and hbsag less than 1000iu/ml, is it still dangerous for excess immune response in this status?
although dangerous if not properly studied on human trial, i see anti pd-L1 as the fastest hbv cure combined with nucs