Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Actual Viral load

by Bobby1952, Feb 01, 2008 07:45AM
Here is my Viral load a few months before I started treatment.

Test                                               Result                         Units                    
Hcv Viral Load (Quant)                     6383442                      Copies/m                    
Item Annotations  05/25/2007                                                                
The lower limit of detection is 3,200 copies/mL or 615 IUs/mL            

Methodology: bdna Signal Amplification technology  

My question is....if this is copies/mL then it must be 2,553,000 copies IU/mL .  

If my calculations are correct then I was wondering which one I should go by when calculating whether I have a high Viral load and whether it can lower my chances of SVR. It would seem to me that a 6 million viral load would lower my chances a lot more for SVR than a 2.5 million Viral load.

  I have 5 weeks of TX left and I am starting to think of these things. I am GT 3A but I don't know if I reached RVR because my GI didn't check my Viral load until 10 1/2 weeks which was undetected.

Thanks
Bobby
Member Comments (14)

by Proactive, Feb 01, 2008 07:59AM
To: Bobby
here is a site that might help you...You can see there are various conversion methods from copies/ml to iu/ml, depending on your test type..

http://www.janis7hepc.com/Viral_Loads.htm

by Proactive, Feb 01, 2008 08:08AM
To: PS
Setting up a simple formula: given 3200 copies/ml = 615 iu/ml

3200/615=6383442 /X would give

6383442 copies/ml = 1,226,818 iu/ml

but check my math....my mind is pretty crispy these days.
Where's Za? She is our resident mathematician

by jmjm530, Feb 01, 2008 08:20AM
As mentioned in your post to me yesterday -- and as stated by Proacive -- the conversion from Copies to IU/ml vaires depending on factors such as the type of test used. For that reason, the international standard (IU/ml) should be used. Isn't your result given in IU/ml?

Anyway, the TMA test you noted yesterday seemed to use a conversion of "2.7" while the Bdna test you now note appears to use a conversion factor of "5.2". I'm extrapolating this from the way the lower detection limit is expressed -- "3,200 copies/mL or 615 IUs/mL "

So if you divide 6,383,442 by 5.2 you end up with 1,227,585 IU/ml. not the 2.55 million IU/ml you seem to note above. (Please see Janis site referenced by "Proactive" to check all this as I'm much more familiar only working in IU/ml)

That said, it really doesn't matter which viral load you pre-treatment in terms of prediciting SVR. I say this because a study suggests the same chance of SVR regardless how high your viral load is unless it's low viral load which I think was defined as around 600,000 IU/ml but not sure. In other words same chance of SVR if your pre-tx viral load was 2 million or 20 million.



by Bobby1952, Feb 01, 2008 08:53AM
To: jmjm530
Jim

"Isn't your result given in IU/ml? "

No. My health center lab still uses copies/mL for viral load tests.



Test                                               Result                         Units                    
Hcv Viral Load (Quant)                     6383442                      Copies/m                    
Item Annotations  05/25/2007                                                                
The lower limit of detection is 3,200 copies/mL or 615 IUs/mL            

Methodology: bdna Signal Amplification technology  

by goldenrule, Feb 01, 2008 10:45AM
To: BOBBY
the cut off point for low viral load is 600 IU/ml

by goldenrule, Feb 01, 2008 10:46AM
To: BOBBY
600,000 iu/ML

by Bobby1952, Feb 01, 2008 03:22PM
To: Goldenrule
Ok....then I am twice that. Not too bad !!

by jmjm530, Feb 01, 2008 03:28PM
To: Bobby
To put things in perspective, most people have more than a 600,000 IU/ml starting viral load, at least from what I read here. FWIW, my pre-tx viral load was 1.5 million IU/ml, and I'm now SVR.


-- Jim

by Deb_c430, Feb 01, 2008 03:35PM
To: all
here is mine,  I know it went up at 4 weeks, instead of down.  Sighs I almost
gave up. Next week another one, which hoping goes down after increasing infergen to daily shots.
thanks Deb




Starting baseline
11/02/07

Hep C Virus RNA QU
HCV RNA Quant PCR  
Abnormality Level   H                    203000                                   <5       IU/ml


HCV RNA PCR copi                  
Abnormality Level   H                    406000                                    <10   copies /m



12/13/07

Protien total serum  2.5
Albumin  Serum     3.9
Globum                  2.5
A/G Ratio               1.6
Bilirubin                   0.8
Alkaline Phosphatease, S      69
AST                                      27
Alt                                        23
HCV Quantasure Plus non graph       610,840   IU/ml
HCV  Log 10                                        5.786  Log 10 IU/ml

by jmjm530, Feb 01, 2008 03:41PM
To: Deb
Other than you're a relapser, don't know much about your prior tx history. Were you a non-responder (less than two-log drop at week 12) or did you respond and then relapse?

In any event, your week 4 test at best shows no viral response so fat. Hopefully, you're seeing a hepatologist (liver specialist) and they have made whatever adjustments in your treatment they feel necessary. If you're not seeing a hepatologist, now would be the time to have a consultation.

-- Jim

by Deb_c430, Feb 01, 2008 03:48PM
To: Jim
No I was on peg and ribovarin and I did drop,  I think if i dig out my labs from that time, I did start slow, BUT it went down. 12 weeks I dropped. by the end of 48 weeks I was UND , stayed that way  at month 6 after tc PCR.
Nines months it was back, I think I told you during the begining of this time I was also on steroids, and some where in my head I have this idea that there is somethin gin that.

No, I am not seeing a hepatologist,  that is probably good advice, I need to look into that.
  Deb

by jmjm530, Feb 01, 2008 03:58PM
To: Deb
Do you remember if you had a two-log drop by week 12? If you didn't, then you were a non-responder and your current treatment should have reflected that. All that, and given the fact that your week 4 test shows no viral response -- I would make an appointment with a hepatologist ASAP. If the hepatologists office tells you that there's a long wait, ask to speak to the office manager, nurse or doctor -- and explain that you're mid-treatment -- you're not responding -- and that you really can't wait that long. Very often, a specialist will see you with minimum wait in such a situation. Try and bring as many records -- blood test, biopsy and ultrasound reports, etc -- as possible with you -- but don't let it delay getting an appointment.

-- Jim

by zazza, Feb 01, 2008 04:09PM
To: Pro, all
Pro, you seem to be quite a mathematician yourself these days! Nothing to add here, except a link that might be of help:

http://www.hcvadvocate.org/hepatitis/factsheets_pdf/Viralload_%202007.pdf

How are you these days, Pro? It is nice to be doing the final countdown, don't you think?

All, 400'000 IU/ml is more and more stated as the cut-off point for low baseline viral load. And I remember seeing graphs which suggest that the higher viral load you have the less chance of SVR, actually down to 20% for high viral load genotype 1 according to one study.

http://www.natap.org/2006/ICAAC/ICAAC_43.htm
(Look at:
Figure 2: "SVR rate as a function of baseline HCV RNA level (loge scale) for patients infected with HCV genotype 1..."
Table 2: "SVR rates by genotype and by viral load cut-off point of 400'000 IU/ml"
Figure 3: "SVR rate as a function of baseline HCV RNA level (loge scale) for patients infected with HCV genotype 2/3...")

Here is another link with other charts. Read for yourself and compare, it is some while ago since I read them last.

http://www.natap.org/2007/EASL/EASL_41.htm

At a quick glance at the figure 3 mentioned above, it does seem to me that the odds of SVR for geno 2 and 3 does not vary much depending on how much above the cut-off point you are (= how much above 400'000 IU/ml).

by Deb_c430, Feb 01, 2008 04:49PM
To: jim
Thanks again will do
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
jdwithhcv commented on photo
10 mins ago
jdwithhcv commented on photo
10 mins ago
franke566 no more turkey
nygirl7 commented on photo
1 hr ago
Marcia2202 commented on photo
2 hrs ago
nygirl7 uploaded new photos
2 hrs ago
Marte313 First out of three exams tomorrow!!
tk777 uploaded a new photo
8 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
Prevention Gains Momentum: Your Gui... 
16 hrs ago by Lee Kirksey, MD
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Community Members