"...Results
* Overall, 298 of 428 patients (70%) achieved RVR and were randomized to Group A (n = 149) or Group B (n = 149).
* The median age was 38 years, 65% were men, the mean weight was 80 kg, 20% had genotype 2, and 80% had genotype 3.
* There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups.
* In an intention-to-treat analysis, SVR was observed in 121 of 149 patients (81%) in Group A and in 131 of 149 patients (88%) in Group B.
* The difference between the 2 groups was 6.7%.
* In a per protocol analysis including only those who received more than 80% of each drug for more than 80% of the scheduled time and who had HCV RNA measured 24 weeks post-treatment, 115 of 127 patients (91%) in Group A and 95 of 100 patients (95%) in Group B achieved SVR.
Conclusion
Based on their findings, the study authors concluded,
The opening paragraph 'pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PegIntron) plus ribavirin'. Unless I'm just tx-impaired, Pegintron is 2B and Pegasys is 2A.
Good eye. No doubt that was the editor's (Ronald Baker) mistake as Peg Intron is mentioned both in the heading and througout. Of course, anyone following the shortened protocol might be advised to get hold of the full-text study/presentation to present to their doctor.
-- Jim
I also assume that the ifn was PegIntron.
I would have never caught it myself. Here's exactly what it says:
pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PegIntron) Contradiction, but the heading does say Pegintron.