Meant to say "per two posts ago" where you said
"By all means as jim has mentioned.... AT THE END OF TREATMENT and no where in between with out first consulting with your doctor."
Sounded to me like we were/are on the same page?
I don't think I understood your last post enough to be affected either way :) I thought we were in agreement per your post before this one. Was there something I said after you want to put up for discussion?
-- Jim
and by no means was the last post any slant towards you. Your contributions have been and are a grounding base for lots of folks coming here for good solid information.
jasper
Yeah, I’ve been kinda sick the past 40 weeks “O” and am still wondering if it’s gone. Man, you covered all the bases on that one. LOL!
But I’m sure everyone will come to their own conclusion or at least a thought of, around week 35 after being through hell as to what is best for them at the end of TX. I am glad it was brought up by a notable researcher with more in depth knowledge and hands on aspects of the nitty gritty of hepc treatments for which my lingering questions have been answered as with a few others.
Cheers!
Jasper
It would be great if more research money went into such tests, but I doubt the profit potential/motivation is anywhere near as great as that a new 'wonder' drug would bring.
There are currently T-cell as well as Nk (natural killer cell ) tests available which measure the rise and fall of these cells. HIV patients use them frequently to gauge their immune fitness I believe.