This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of
Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new
Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
Some HCV+ people with high VL's can maintain minimal liver damage, while other people with low VL's can have significant damage. Since this is true, it's difficult to say with certainty if prednisone therapy would result in acclerating the damage to your liver (by increasing your VL). I do know that automimmune
hepatitis patients can become cirrhotic very quickly without suppressive therapy, even if their VL's are much lowere without prednisone. In other words, the prednisone can actually greatly retard liver damage caused by the overactive immune system attacking the liver, even in the presence of a higher VL.
There are some recent posts about this, where DoubleDose and mikesimon have referenced a few reports which refer to a couple of isolated cases where a supposed viral "rebound" was observed in a few post transplant patients (who were undergoing immunosuppressive therapy in order to thwart transplant rejection). Otherwise, I think jim stated pretty much precisely how I feel about the matter. Bottom line if there's any way to avoid steroids, you should. But considering you aren't HCV negative anyway, and you really REALLY need the stuff (which sometimes you do, don't ask how I know!) then I would go ahead and use it. The only caveat is that if I were using it over a prolonged/ongoing basis I would get a baseline VL, LFT's and fibrosure. Then I would monitor these values every couple of months to make sure it's not taking you down the primrose path.
Best of luck to you.
However if it's a life or death situation type thing...of course you have to use it. Like all things we have to use common sense in decisions.
Personally - I'd try EVERYTHING else I could before I'd take pred now...but I've taken it many times in the past and if it weren't for this forum - I'd NEVER have thought about it.
I wish doctors could know little things like this...
Thank GOD for you guys.
I think it's like every other TX side effect. You don't know if you'll be the one to get the really serious side effects or not. You also don't know if you'll be the one to relapse due to prednisone use.
It's a freeking cr@p shoot, either way.
you are so right - it IS a giant cr@pshoot and that is why we have the follow the common sense rules as best as we can to avoid everything that might do something.............it's unbelievable how MANY variables there truly can be.
and still...no guarantee at that.
hopefully some very greedy company will develop the drug that just wipes it OUT~ and we won't have this problem any more. I'm hoping that the desire for billions of dollars will really push them on fast! :)
Well sure I can. My points are simply this: Prednisone has been/currently is/will continue to be commonly/appropriately/successfully used in a variety of forms for a variety of ailments in both HCV+ and HCV- (SVR) patients where and when its (limited) use is warranted. It is a fallacious statement to flatly advise/imply to all HCV/SVR patients to never take steroids of any type for any reason under any circumstances. Please re-read my last post to you for clarification.
Rev quote: “I certainly don't need a lesson in the ins and outs of AIH from you but thanks for the tips. You are playing doctor, second guessing my doctor and making wild statements and I am afraid I am done with your particular issue.”
I most certainly am not playing doctor, nor have I attempted to give you medical advice, nor have I made any “wild statements”, nor have I suggested what your doctor has prescribed for you is wrong. I’ve not said any such thing to you. You appear to be attempting to go on an irrelevant/detractive ad hom tangent, instead of reckoning with the previously referenced Janis link/quote concerning how AIH is (most) commonly treated (i.e. with steroids, of course). You seem to simplistically think that just because I’m pointing out that AIH is most commonly treated with steroids, that I’m suggesting that YOU take steroids. That’s absurd, and I said no such thing.
Rev quote: “Please, your use of the words "long term" and SVR are ridiculous -- there are no long term SVRs unless you're talking 10-15 years. That isn't long term. It is longer than the life of a bug and many dogs but really not when it comes to human beings. I am always amused by members of this forum that use "long term durability of the SVR". You're telling me -- seeing as approved medical science (the High Priests) -- a decade is "long term" and I have to laugh at that and don't respect your lack of rigor one bit.”
First off, yes I would describe a 10+ year interval as long term, and it's not "ridiculous" to do so. Ten+ years is a significant chunk of a human lifespan; more than a decade is a lotta water under the bridge. And remember, it’s not JUST 10+ years, it’s 10+ AND HAPPILY COUNTING. That’s important! Maintaining a sero HCV- status for over ten years (and deriving its dramatically positive health benefits) is something to talk about, and is very significant. It’s definitely *not* inconsequential, it’s a very meaningful and positive occurrence. Why can't you acknowledge that? Are you suggesting the ‘virologically resurgent pumpkin carriage’ is just around the bend for all those SVR’s beyond the ten year mark? If so, that’d be an awfully silly thing to say/suggest without substantiation.
Lastly, of course you’ve failed to consider naturally cleared SVR’s. That’s a mistake, because there are natural SVR’s on this good earth that’ve maintained their HCV- status for many decades. HCV has been around a long time, probably longer than an average human lifespan (and perhaps much longer than that). And it’s well known that amongst the naturally HCV cleared, their HCV- durability is as high as the drug induced SVR’s (if not higher).
Best wishes...