To Treat or Not To Treat

[mauilady]

I'm sure this has come up before, but I can't find it: I'd like to know what made all of you opt for the treatment (interferon/ribavarin)?  I went to the HCV class yesterday, which was put on by a hepatologist, who seemed to really know his stuff.  (too bad he can't be my primary care md... )  He basically said that there is really no way of knowing exactly where the virus stands; that only 5% of the people infected will at some point in their lives end up with a full-blown case of hep.  If alcohol is stopped (and he couldn't stress the importance of this enough), and one leads a healthy lifestyle by eating right and getting lots of good and aerobic exercise, and taking milk thistle, the chances of living a long and healthy life are significantly greater.

To be honest, I really don't feel like subjecting myself to a year of misery, which would also entail driving to town (a place I prefer to avoid; it's an hour away... and totally nuts) TWICE a week.  The cost factor didn't even come up.  So I would rather take that five percent chance and continue doing what I'm doing, as I feel totally fine now.

Comments, please!!  :-)

[jmjm530]

I treated because I had significant (stage 3) liver disease. If my biopsy didn't show stage 3, I'd still be waiting for better drugs. Treating or not treating is a complex and very individual decision, often with no right or wrong answers. Within a year, important
SVR (cure) trial data will be available from the VX-950 trials. It might make sense to wait for the results if you can afford to.

-- Jim