HEPATITIS C COMMUNITY
Viral

Viral

I finally got my Viral Load & Geno Loads taken. My doctor says they are 3 & 2 Million (& then some). Should I be concerned about this?
Related Discussions
38 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
If I understand you correctly...you are genotype 3?  With a little over 2 mil viral load?  There is a lot of other factors to consider here. First of all genotype 3...has very good svr rate if you are considering treatment.  Have you had a biopsy and did you just recently find out you had hep c?  Have you been sick from the hep?  Its hard to answer your question until we have more info on you.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
In response to additional information needed. Yes I have been diagnosed since 1993. Yes I am having alot of fatique,nausea, bloating, and body aches. No, I have not had a biopsy; as I have NO coverage medical what-so-er!ve
                 Thank You,
              Bobbie Jean Nicley
              AKA/StashedOne
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Welcome to the site, yes a biopsy as Scott told you tells the TRUE story of what shape your liver is in.  The genotype 3 isnt too bad, they tend to have a better chance of clearing/killing the virus if they go on the interferon type treatment.  The 2 million viral load isnt bad, they say we Hep C folks make and kill trillions of viruses a DAY, the 2 million is in an "International Unit"  (IU) which is I dunno, a little drop or two of blood I AM GUESSING.  You can be real sick and have 2 million IU,  or no symptoms and have 14 million, ya just cant tell with this strange virus (hepatitis C)  I sure hope you get qualified for some kind of medical assistance since you are having symptoms. If you need to know more about getting financial assistance just ask and we will post some links for you.  OHC
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Genotype 3 has been shown to be the worst as far as progression and Fibrosis goes.
YEP.I'd be concerned. Especially if you're having symptoms. you need a biopsy and a GI or Hep specialist ASAP.
There are programs through the drung companies that can cover the meds themselves either all or in part if you meet their requirements. But first you need to get that biopsy done.
You might be able to find a clinical trial for this too depending on where you live. The trails cover all the costs of tx....including the doctor visits.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Through personal experience Genotype 3 happens to be one of the easiest to treat and I have had it for over 30 years with out rapid progression and fibrosis. The main thing is-this  thing is slow moving and you have the time to make some educated decisions regarding attacking the virus. Including no alcohol, smoking, or any chemical that you can steer clear of. Good low fat or no animal fat diet and get all of the fax. I had almost 3 mil viral load and was undetectable at twelve weeks on Peg/co-pegus with minimal sides except physical fatigue and I have every reason to believe these last 6 weeks will produce the same results. Geno
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
At the risk of being stupid, I ask the following; If you have HepC and have decided to go through tx, does a biopsy REALLY matter?  The success or failure of tx can be determined by blood work.  Thanks.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I was diagnosed a year ago and I just just recently had my first visit with my hepatologist, the first thing I asked for was a Hep B vaccine and I told him I wanted to be treated.
He sent me to do an echo and had me tested for geno type, he really did not have an opinion on the bx he felt since, I was going to treat why put me thru all that. Well I have not started treatment yet and am scheduled to go back here soon. I do want a Bx it is my life not his and I would like to know what damage my liver has. So I guess it depends on the Dr and the patient. I want one if he does not want to do one then I will find someone else.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Sorry to butt in on this thread but it won't let me post a question and I need some help. I'M FREAKING OUT. My Dr's nurse told me today that he's pulling me off treatment (peg/copeg)because my neutraphils are below 1000. I also have sore armpits so the Dr. will see me at 3:30 tomorrow. I don't know what to say to him. I talked to the nurse and asked if he will prescribe neupogen instead of pulling me off and she said probably not. That he usually doesn't do that. She said he may ajust the dosage but for njow to stop all rib & interferon. She says maybe the medication isn't good for me. I took shot #4 on Saturday. I am doing good with this tx and I don't want to stop. My sides are few considering what some of you guys go through. This is such an emotional roller coaster. You have so much anxiety waiting tro start tx, then you start and then have to stop? This sucks. I know that the RBC's go down in the first couple of months. I don't unserstand why he's just making me stop in the 4th week. I am a 1a with a viral load of 150,000. Do you think it's because mine case is milder? Please someone give me some ideas of what I can say to him. THANKS,
Michelle
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Ok...First...ROFL  I tripped Indy on the way out the door as I was entering! heh  I guess he had his jollies for the day on his way to work but the real pic I would like to see...Is his reaction when he saw thread "sensitive subject" hahaha I bet he couldn't click quick enough to get to that posting!!  

Now your prob...I haven't had that....Yet!  So who knows but I'm thinking today watch everything you eat...very bland things only.  Drink some green tea if you have just to relax your stomach and see if changing up diet a little helps relieve it.  I know this may not help but...Geeze!  We never know at times what to do short of bleeding from the butt, foaming at the mouth or passed out cold on floor...When do you call the paramedics?  But seriously...if persists I would definitely call your dr. This tx is nothing to mess with!!  Good Luck!
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I too am facing a dr's appt on Wed, (not my reg liver doc but his stand in) who wants me to stop tx since I missed my Pegasys shot for 13 days.  But I am not quitting tx and not even sure I want to go see this jerk.  But anyhow, I want to reassure you Michelle, that your blood counts arent any worse than mine were at 4 weeks into tx.  My ANC was .8 or 800, WBC were 2.8, and my doc didnt stop tx or change anything.  They even came up by week 6 so I hope you can tell him to not change anything.  He is the boss but hopefully if you show you are determined to continue tx he will work with you on it!  Some docs are more aggressive, more experimental, and some are cautious.  If yours is "too cautious" you can always get a second opinion.
Oh, by the way, I did end up going on Neupogen at week 16.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
INDI, if i tol you once i tol you a thousan times,..quit hangin aroun those "drung companies trails"....NO DOUBT LOOKING FOR OTTERS OR SOMETHING...

OK, we know you can drink now... so quit rubbin it in...:O)


STASHEDONE, i'm 3a and i have early cirrhosis, mine did like indi said, and progressed fast... you really need treatment...even if you don't get a biopsy.  there are "trials" that people can go on by the drug companies... and they cover expences...and if you"re really a 3 gyno type, then i believe it is not even "required" that you have a biopsy in order to start treatment.

although that is what you are going to WANT eventually, anyway to determin how close you are to needing a transplant or if you can wait...etc...you've gotta find out what shape your liver is in, and a biopsy is the only way to be sure about that...blood tests and ct scans... can only tell you a little bit...

if you truly have no insurance then you need some advice on how to go about this...i believe that, depending on where you live, they can not deny you of needed health care if you go through the right channels. the question is what are they? does anyone here know? where do you live???

THIS IS YOUR LIFE, AND I WOULDN'T LET THE DR.S DECIDE THE OUTCOME... YOU NEED TO BE FORCEFUL ABOUT GETTING THESE THINGS TAKEN CARE OF. ESP... IF YOU HAVE NO INSURANCE... THIS DOESN'T EXACTLY MOTIVATE THE DR.S TO DO RIGHT BY YOU...UNFORTUNATLY... YOUR FUTURE IS IN YOUR HANDS...YOU MUST MAKE SURE YOU GET THE NEEDED TREATMENT ASAP AND FIND OUT HOW TO DO THAT...or you could be facing end stage liver disease before you know it...

won't your dr/or healthcare system work with you? this is a life or death situation... it sounds like you have the symptoms of serious liver problems that can get bad fast. you do not have time to wait arround... perhaps some do, but not if your liver is haveing those symptoms...bloating can be a sign of liver failure...i don't mean to scare you but, yes, you should be concerned...

i pray that you will recieve the help you need soon. let us know what you find out... keep coming back here for support... we do care...

Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I  the UK they have decided to stop giving biopsies to genotype 2s and 3s bsfore tx. The thinking is that they have such a good chance of clearing that you should do it whatever damge you have.
As for 1s, since the odds are so much lower, they will continue to biopsy.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Hi everyone! I am 11 1/2 weeks into the 48 weeker.  I am a 1a stage 2.

I saw my liver dude on Monday.  Had my viral load rechecked.  I had been told all along that because I am a 1a that I needed to do the full 48 weeks - regardless of whether I cleared the virus or not.  The reasoning being that it stopped and perhaps reversed the fibrosis.  By my hepatolgist - who is nationally known for his work with Hep C patients - said that if I haven't cleared the virus he will stop treatment.  He says there has been evidence that nothing changes if we don't clear the virus.

Have any of you heard this?  I was mentally prepared to do the 48 weeks. Is there research out there to support one side of the other?

Help!
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I think you have to weigh up whether 24 weeks of interferon and the side effects it might cause (some permanent) are worth a possibly slight and temporary improvement in fibrosis. The hospital I used to go (also world famous for liver care) stop all genotype 1s who have not responded at 24 weeks.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
WHEW!!!   Thats a whole lotta questions packed into 1 thread here.
NO WAY I would stop just because my ANC was below 1000. Hell, most all of us went below THAT. 750 is the point where they almost have to "think" about altering tx. I would DEMAND neupogen, a second opinion, or at the very worst...a "temporary" peg reduction for 3 weeks and then a recheck. To stop now would be to throw away your best chance at beating this.

Yes its true that type 2's and 3's have the best odds st beating this. It has also be shown in studies that type 3's have the worst rates of progression. That is why it's so important for them to pay close attention to testing and tx. I can go look up the studies if anyone really want them and can't find them on their own.

The perspective on biopsies is changing. Biopsies are an "invasive" proceedure and are not without risks. Little things like knicking a pancreas, or a bowl, or bleeding to death...."little" things like that can happen. These "little" things can cause permanent damages of their own....or even death. Although these problems are rare now, the dangers are still there. The docs now are shying away from biopsies unless there is a compelling reason to do one. If you are going to treat anyways then there really isn't any BIG reason to have one. I didn't. If you are still sitting on "The Fence", or having some MAJOR symptoms, then by all means get one done. It does provide the last bit on information you need to make a decision on tx. It can also aid in decision making if you have complications on tx and need to make some tx decisions on how agressive to be. But it is NOT a "requirement" by any means. Weigh the pros and cons before you get one.

Hey Litecloud....I hope you got bOTH the hep A & B vaccines. You don't want to get either disease with Hcv.

Hmmmm...I never thought about them Otters. Do ya think they might be in Cahoots with The Badger too? They look Soooo cute.....what a disguise! I will have to set up a patrol to keep an eye on them varmints to check this one out.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
hahahahahahahahaha
Since girls NEVER fart, I suppose ya gotta blame it on "something". VERY good move...."baby Dragon breath". But soon you will need to come up with something else to blame it on after you clear the Dragon.
Most girls I know blame the closest Man or Dog in the area. Thought I'd pass this along as a public service.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I understand how emotionally charged these situations can be while you're still trying to adjust to the effects of tx on your mind and body. But your doctor should take a deep breath and not over-react to those numbers. Sure, they are a little low, but that's normal on tx. Many people would love to have those numbers at week 4. Before you discuss the situation with him, read the <a HREF="http://www.rocheusa.com/products/pegasys/pi.pdf">Pegasys product guide re: Adverse Reactions/dose reduction for low anc</a>. Calmly lay it out to him that you do not want to quit and you need his help to keep you on track.

If your doctor wants to stop you for an anc below 1000, he evidently is not very experienced and you may need a new doctor. Since he is unwilling to use Neupogen (and I don't think it's warranted yet), ask him to simply allow you to follow the Roche's recommendations, which most people seem to feel are very conservative.

I know of know supplements to boost white cells, but you can try folic acid for hemoglobin and RBC. Good luck.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Thanks, I had a hep A vaccine done around 91/92 and when I was tested for hepc it was still working, just need the B vaccine, which I would like before treatment starts. Otters/Badgers, Am thinking if yah can't find them, maybe they all went to the loo !!
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Since viral load is not the optimum for assessing liver disease or status of the liver's condition, a biopsy is the gold standard for making that determination.

Viral load has never been associated with the health of the liver, not in any independently funded study.

And, since interferon therapy does NOT turn back the clock on the health of the liver, any damage that is seen on biopsy needs to be under a doctor's care, regardless of treatment outcome. For this reason, it is folly to think alcohol consumption, smoking or exposure to liver toxic substances is just fine after a course of successful treatment. These substances can further damage the liver regardless of the viral status. Unless you have had a post treatment biopsy and know for a fact that your liver is "healed," it is a mistake to assume this is so based on studies of other people.

Research into a cure for hepatitis C is now directed at anti-fibrotic agents for just this reason. Eradicating the virus MAY stop progression, but there is no guarantee of that. Studies have shown that those who sustain a response do better over the two year post treament than those who do not, no doubt, but this is not 100% and it is still only a two year window. Caveat emptor.  

Without a biopsy, you will not have a "snapshot" of the condition of your liver at the point in time PRIOR to interferon therapy. It may be important to know at some point whether the interferon did you any good from a histological perspective. In fact, it could be critical information that is lost if a biopsy is not done.

NO genotype is associated with worsening progression. There is no bad genotype other than those that expose a patient to a higher rate of potential adverse events. Genotyping is a matter of determining what the length of treatment will be for those who need to treat and that is all.

And lastly, your doctor is the expert on you, not anyone on the internet. The only thing that is worth demanding, in my opinion,is the biopsy.  Your doctor has your medical chart and has the experience to treat you and assess where the level of risk BASED ON YOUR MEDICAL CIRCUMSTANCES lies for you. If you are not satisfied, discuss you dissatisfaction with your doctor. Getting into a confrontation with your doctor isn't in your best interest.

You will not die without treatment or if treatment does not succeed. Please do not fall into this melodrama of the "dragon eating your liver." Gather your relevant facts, your support system, and discuss all of the potential benefits and costs with your doctor.

Make decisions at strategic points. But continuuing treatment is not worth any risk/cost unless you decide it is and if your doctor agrees.  There are only a few cases where that would be true. Very few. And that decision should be a medical one, not one based on internet superstitions about liver eating dragons and interferon in shining armour.


If the interferon succeeds and you realize an SVR, you are not off the hook in caring for yourself and maintaining good health and liver friendly habits. Alcohol ( and smoking) abstenance is prudent for anyone who has ever had liver disease. Alcohol isn't good for anyone's liver.

If treatment fails you, you are not doomed. There is reason, and  lots of it, for hope and the promise of new, less toxic, and more effective treatments in the relatively near future. The United States is not the only place, or even the best place, where good research is taking place. Australia, Canada and France, Germany, even Italy have committed many more resources to basic research and services to patients than the USA currently is committing. Patients in those countries have demanded it.

I hope this helps,

thanbey

<a href="http://www.hcop.org">Hepatitis C Outreach Project</a>


Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I just found the mail and my new lab results were there.
My WBC is 2.5 (3.5-10.4), abs neut 0.9 , Hgb 11.8 (11.9-14.8), hct 35.7 (37.1-45.8), Gran 35 (44-74) all of those are in the below normal range. My lymph is high, 52 normal is 18-43. My WBC's were 2.9 then 3.1, now 2.5. ALso doesanyone know of berries or vitamins that you can take to help with these numbers?
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Like I said this morning hope your feeling better soon, am glad you have someone there with you and you got to talk to your DR.
My prayers are with you "Little Buddy"
I have a comment on the blood pressure as some of you know am not in treatment yet. But I have noticed since I have been diagnose, my blood pressure keeps on playing games with me.
Does any one know where I can get off the internet, a blood pressure checker, but not a wrist one there not very accurate.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Morbidity and mortality studies support the statements made above.

Everyone is going to die. But very few die of hepatitis C.

Those who do are generally those who were diagnosed too late to be treated with interferon therapy or to make significant changes to lifestyle. That is what the studies tell us.

best,

thanbey



Blank
Avatar_f_tn
I believe those are studies on liver disease/failure related to hcv.  Given.
Some studies found cryoglobulins present in various tissues in our hcv infected body. Who can really say if this presence is not contributing to the deterioration/failure of this organ and our possible demise in the future?  Stats won't show that illness to be contributed to by chronic hcv and liver related.  
NO one really knows, we should take most information on hcv as an educated scientific guess based on limited data.
WE (in tx) are the data of the future retrospect studies.  Some of us might not be around to see them.
I believe the unknowns of hcv to be significantly higher than the present stats show.  That is why I would never dare to present a statement on hcv as the ultimate truth.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Cuteous,

Fair enough. But why assume, in the face of so much evidence to the contrary (50 years of data, by the way), that people are going to die without being treated or if the treatment fails them?

It seems to me that it is less likely anyone will die of cryoglobunemia (has anyone ever died of cryo?) or hepatitis C whether treated or not.

Until we do know more,and I certainly agree we need to, why in the world assume the worst and keep believing that the sky is falling? Why dash hope for so many people who cannot treat for various reasons or for whom the treatment has made things worse, not better, or for whom it has had little effect at all? Only a small percentage of those with hepatitis C have the choice to treat, can tolerate it, or realize a rsult from it.

There is simply no generalizable  scientific basis  for the treat or die point of view. None.

thanbey

Blank
Avatar_n_tn
thanbey, first of all I appreciate your participation in this forum and secondly, I enjoy your comments and links to HCV information.  However, why are we all taking interferon/ribavirin to eradicate HCV if the virus and it's complications are not going to kill us at some point?  Your comments are inconsistent with information provided by the NIH that states "An estimated 8,000-10,000 Americans die annually of complications related to HCV. This figure is expected to triple in the next 10-20 years."  Indeed, if 4 million people in the US have HCV and 10,000 of them die from it's complications, mathematically it is a small percentage.  It is not a club of which I'd like to be a member. I know that I certainly don't want to die (not at the tender age of 50!), get liver cancer, cirrhosis, fibrosis, have a liver transplant or lead a sickly HCV existence until I expire.  Speaking for myself and with all due respect, I think your comments directed at a group of HCV folks, struggling with the disease and tx are a bit too cavalier and insensitive.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
"thanbey, first of all I appreciate your participation in this forum and secondly, I enjoy your comments and links to HCV information."

Thank you very much.

"However, why are we all taking interferon/ribavirin to eradicate HCV if the virus and it's complications are not going to kill us at some point?"

Number one not everyone is, or can, undertake interferon therapy. Those who cannot, do not, or who  do not respond are important people to consider, just as those who choose to treat are important.

The reason people treat is because it is what is availalbe at this time and the only thing that is FDA approved. The short-commings of the current treatments are well documented and the risks are real. Those who can be treated and who can tolerate the treatment are a  minority of people. In the USA, the medical system demands a doctor prescribe what is currently available or face possible legal consequences. And I personally support anyone who wishes to undertake interferon therapy for any reason. It is about choices and options based on sound information.


"Your comments are inconsistent with information provided by the NIH that states "An estimated 8,000-10,000 Americans die annually of complications related to HCV. This figure is expected to triple in the next 10-20 years." Indeed, if 4 million people in the US have HCV and 10,000 of them die from it's complications, mathematically it is a small percentage."

My comments are totally consistent with the NIH conference presntations, many of which did not agree and the statistics in the presentations  being under discussion, not written in stone.

A presentation made by the Hepatitis C Outreach Project at the invitation of the NIH, spoke to this. What we pointed out to the participants is that, without a screening and testing program in this country, people are being diagnosed too late. Lifestyle choices, particulalry alcohol and smoking, fatty livers and many other factors, including genetics, play a role in how progression will advance, when it advances. Early diagnosis affords the greatest choice for patient and provider. And, when it comes to the situation we are now in where treatments are not adequate, that can make a critical difference.

People are dying because of a lack available organs and donors and inadequate treatment options. We do not have a cure yet.  They are dying because they are not diagnosed early enough in the disease to make changes that make a difference.

They will continue to die in spite of the current treatments. We need better treatment. We need treatment that is affordable, tolerable and effective. Such a treatment does not currently exist.

Right now treatment is the choice of a only a few. Interferon were availalbe to everyone, people would still die because it is not appropriate for everyone and does not work more than half the time, and we are still not sure what the definition of "work" is.


"It is not a club of which I'd like to be a member. I know that I certainly don't want to die (not at the tender age of 50!), get liver cancer, cirrhosis, fibrosis, have a liver transplant or lead a sickly HCV existence until I expire."

You are fortunate to have the choice you do. I sincerely hope that your choice results in the best possible result for you. If it does not, there is still every reason to believe you will not be a member of that club, anyway.

"Speaking for myself and with all due respect, I think your comments directed at a group of HCV folks, struggling with the disease and tx are a bit too cavalier and insensitive."

I am sorry you see it that way. I would like to think we can all learn to change our perceptions to include those who have hepatitis C who are poor, African American, inmates, who have not responded or cannot treat due to other co-morbiditites and others who do not have the good fortune you do. In my opinion, it would be a good idea to come to grips with the reality that this community deserves better than what is available now and not to settle on this as a cure.  That belief will line the pocket of the drug companies, but hardly do anything to eradicate the virus. My moral compass dictates that I tell the truth even when I don't like the truth. And, I don't like this truth. I want interferon to be the panacea for hepatitis C, but it isn't. It just isn't. It is the best we have, but it isn't good enough.

To continue to direct all attention to those who can tolerate treatment or who can afford treatment does an injustice to those who come here seeking information, support and hope. To assume that staying on treatment is worth all costs and all risks is simply insensitive to others who cannot do so. It's a balance we all have to try to maintain. I'm doing my best and I thank you sincerely for this opportunity to respond to  your comments in a civilized exchange of ideas.


thanbey
Blank
Avatar_f_tn
HCV is NOT just a liver disease, and should not be judged on its morbidity alone. Until that changes, there will not be widespread screening that will lead to a more accurate picture of the hcv presence in the population.
There will not be a clear picture of how this chronic illness has decreased the quality of life of ? number of people.
It is not death from liver disease that I fear, but the reduced enjoyment of health and life activities.  Until this is clear to the non-infected, we will not see further treatment options.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
JUST BECAUSE YOUR HEAD IS IN THE SAND IT DOES NOT MEAN YOU DON'T HAVE A DIRTY BUTT!!!

no one hear is saying that anyone will deffinately die of liver disease. we are simply saying that we COULD IF WE ARE NOT CAREFUL!  

we are not going to hide our eyes like a kid and pretend that everything is going to be ok. apparently you have not had your loved one die of liver disease...i have!!!

believe me it's not pretty!!! both treatment and nontreatment need to be concidered very seriously.

p.s. i agree whole heartedly about the alchohol. i was just havin a little fun with indy...

i completely disagree (and i hope that's ok with you) about people with type 3. type 3 causes steatosis, see artical below:

http://merck.praxis.md/index.asp?page=pubmedAbstract&PubMedID=14960527&hilight=STEATOSIS

by the way steatosis can lead to liver death in and of itself...

if this artical doesn't do the trick let me know. there are many other articles on type 3.

it is the fact that type 3 has been shown to lead to worse steatosis than the other types, and that is a cause for worsening fibrosis...

Blank
Avatar_n_tn
WOW.......Nice discussion everyone. SEE...We CAN all "play" nice and still get all our points across.
Ok...Here are some links on Genotype 3 and progression. I was not exactly correct in that Type 3's do NOT automatically have worse fibrosis. Tyoe 3's DO have worse Steatosis....which leads to fibrosis...and also has complications of its own and can still kill you with or without the virus.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?holding=npg&cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11391523&dopt=Abstract

http://www1.elsevier.com/gej-ng/10/26/38/99/48/44/abstract.html

http://hcvadvocate.org/news/newsRev/2004/HJR-1.5.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12445426&dopt=Abstract

http://www.askemilyss.com/bites/bite0701/steat.htm

Thanbey....I for one welcome your comments no matter what they are. I think that it is fair to allow everyone to have ALL the credible information they can find to make their own appropriate decisions. The others who can't do tx or fail at it need some support that many of us who are "Tx oriented" can't really offer. We just don't look at that stuff much but rather focus our energies on getting through tx as well as possible. That other info is much needed by some folks. Thank you for giving them something to latch on to.

Scott.........Good Job there man. I'm proud of ya.

Blank
Avatar_n_tn
comment above by thanbey,..."you will NOT die without treatment or if treatment does not succeed..."

please give me THE STUDY TO BACK UP THis STATEMENT...if you do not increase your chance of morbidity by keeping the virus, than why go on interferon at all????? common sence here....

if alchohol increases your liver damage rate than you can bet hep c does too. why do we need further testing beyond 2 years for this? this is common sense!!!  if we can kill the virus we should...

JUST AS I CAN NOT TELL SOMEONE THAT THEY WILL DIE OF HCV YOU CAN NOT TELL THEM THEY WILL NOT...
Blank
Avatar_f_tn
lvg; you are right on girl.  That same proclamation got to me.

chevy; that is the strangest thing, about two months into tx, as anemia was taking hold of me, I developed such a horrible pain in the head! i never have headaches, so i went for a scan thinking aneurysm.  my pcp was puzzled. It was on the left side, making the left ear canal itch and ache,and with such pressure against the frontal sinuses! I would wake up in the middle of the night with it.  It subsided after 2 wks. and no one can say what it was.  An mri showed no nerve damage in the neck and the scan was normal.    I hope you feel better.
ps: nice subtle message to scott in the other post :-}
Blank
Avatar_f_tn
Back in another post I mentioned that my normal 118/78 had gradually increased to 160/100. I thought I was heading for a stroke, especially with the headache.  You can't rule out a real problem until you are seen and properly tested.  maybe not er, but call your dr and ask for his input. now girl.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
you are in my prayers. i think if i was in your shoes i would call my physician and let him decide if you should go to the emergency room or not. are you at home with someone? someone should keep an eye on you tonight. you need to get ahold of your dr. or the one on call tonight. just in case it's something serious. i'm praying for you right now.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I never had that particular side, but I have seen others complain of it. As with Cuteus, it seemed to just "go away after a few days or so. So just lay back, light some candles, put on the soft music, and sink into "somewhere else". Anything to calm down. Put your son in charge of putting out the candles though. I had many problems with FIRE on my tx. It is NOT our friend on the meds.
Run the problem by your doc tomorrow.
Maybe you just need an "Oil Change"?
Come on up to "Indys' Garage and Badger Store" and we'll fix you right up! Get on I-69 north out of Indianapolis and we'll flag you down when you go by..........The Gatorades always on tap!
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
What's up with the ear itch thing? I had it in my rt ear and I scratched it raw. My normally low bp is all over the place since tx. I have had so many weird pains like you are talking about and have psyched myself out at times which made my bp go even higher. Things have always gone away but watch yourself.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Thank you for your prompt response.  I suppose I disagree with your assertion that "you will not die without treatment or if treatment does not succeed." Tell that to the surviving families of the 8,000-10,000 folks that died last year from HCV complications. You'd be going to 27 funerals a day.  Along with many others, I have stumbled along with treatment for months, making great personal, social and financial sacrifices in order to regain my health.  I just find it somewhat repugnant that someone is categorically dismissive of interferon/ribavirin tx and tells me "it would be a good idea to come to grips with reality that this community deserves better than what is available now and not to settle on this as a cure."  Interferon/ribavirin is all we have right now and by no means do I deem it the magic bullet.  I could relapse shortly after I finish tx. Perhaps for you, saving humanity from HCV is your mission and I applaud you for that.  For me, right now, saving raheem is my goal and my reality.....and not to the exclusion of others.  I think we are all cognizant that tx doesn't work for everyone and it could be better and will be better.  I basically come here for facts and data not for hugs and kisses, but I simply thought you had a glib response to a complex question.  In no way am I starting an on line food fight and I DO enjoy 99% of your comments.  Keep up the good work.
Blank
Avatar_f_tn
Wow, it amazes me how anyone can make a definitive statement as to whether we are going to live or die, almost sounding like gospel, based on their opinion.
Do your own research to reputable sites and the ultimate decission lies with YOU with the assistance of a provider to monitor the progress.  Find one that will work WITH you and for you, but he is not the absolute last word on anything about hep c, NO ONE is.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
I was diagnosed with hep C after 2 years of odd swellings and rashes.  The way I was diagnosed was due to a visual blood test from the rhuemotoligists office staff.  this was in 1995.  He wanted to put me on cancer control meds, but I insisted on a second opinion. He called a liver specialist he knew and found out about a new RNA test which could identify hep C.  He did the test, found out that cryogloblenemia was an identifying factor of hep C.  Took interferon for 18 months (first protocal was 6 mos, then 12 mos, then 18 mos) which was considered by insurance "experimental" which I disputed and won.  ICK.  Was so sick all I could do was work, eat and sleep.  But....now I am disease free (in complete remission).
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Comment
Post A Comment
Go
Blank
Weight Tracker
Reach your weight goal faster
Start Tracking Now
MedHelp Health Answers
Submit
Top Hepatitis Answerers
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
willbb
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
copyman
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
jmjm530
223152_tn?1321976790
Blank
frijole
Midland, TX
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
mikesimon
179856_tn?1333550962
Blank
nygirl7
Planet Earth, CT
RSS Expert Activity
1741471_tn?1336957856
Blank
LIVE WEBINAR TOMORROW!-SUPER BODY, ... Blank
May 22 by Michael Gonzalez-WallaceBlank
2126606_tn?1335910182
Blank
Fibromyalgia Awareness
May 11 by Clare Waismann Kavin, RASBlank
2126606_tn?1335910182
Blank
Opioid-induced hyperalgesia reduces...
May 03 by Clare Waismann Kavin, RASBlank