Its confusing because there is no 100% guarantee either way.. However, I would say that putting your
fingerAmputated finger
Amyloidosis on the fingers
Clubbed fingers
Cryoglobulinemia - of the fingers
Finger pain
Herpes zoster (shingles) on the hand and fingers
Janeway lesion on the finger
Kawasaki's disease, peeling of the fingertips
Nail abnormalities
Replantation of digits
Ringworm, tinea manuum on the finger in the vagina of a
womanWomen's way having a herpes outbreak and then touching your
penisCancer - penis
Curvature of the penis
Penis care (uncircumcised)
Penis pain within one minutes is low risk for transmission. Its a question that comes up very frequently. One should remember that it is not only a matter of virus being present for transmission to occur but also that sufficient quantities of virus must be present, and in this situation, I would seriously doubt that sufficient quantities of herpes virus would be present in this circumstance to infect yourself.
Have you, at some point, been tested for herpes to know that you actually don't have it? 90% of those infected don't know, and traditionally STD screens don't include it.
Terri
And I do agree that herpes should be an essential part of STD screening. There are many reasons this is not routinely done ranging from stigma issues to funding to lack of understanding of the importance of knowing one is infected. We have a long way to go, suffice to say.
Terri