Either is possible - that the result is a false positive or that you've been recently infected (you can eliminate the term "exposure" when thinking about herpes). You would not necessarily have seroconversion at two weeks for HSV 2, no.
Terri
Thanks so much for your input Terri. Obviously, I am extremely terrified and also worried that I may have exposed someone else. I know the only way to be certain is wait awhile and get tested again but I was wondering one thing: The range that my HSV1 was in suggests "recent infection". Is it possible I've never been exposed to HSV1 and just now acquired it-that is why its in the "equivocal" range? I know I tested early but it would seem if i had gotten hsv2 that it would have at least registered on the low end at 2 weeks?
I would say it is unreliable, yes. About 50% of people make antibody within 3 weeks, but the rest take between 3 weeks and 4 months. This test needs to be repeated when sufficient time has gone by to make antibody to be considered accurate.
Terri
I read some studies that most patients test positive within 3 weeks, I know 2 weeks is soon but is it totally unreliable?
So basically, you can know that as a baseline test, you were negative for HSV 2 and almost negative for HSV 1. Now you need to wait 3-4 months and get retested, because 2 weeks is definitely too soon for an accurate test.
Terri
I'm sorry I misstyped and it wont let me edit
HSV 2 IgG <0.91
Ok these are my lab results:
HSV 1 IgG, Type Spec 1.08 High
HSV 2 IgG Type Spec 1.09
Negative indicates no antibodies present. Equivocal may suggest early infection.
These tests were done by Labcorb