I'm glad you followed through on the additional testing to get the answers you needed :)
congrats on being negative!
grace
okay, so i took the 8 panel test again because i already paid for it and the doctor talked to me and said that my hsv 2 herepselect test was now 1.25 (16 weeks after exposure). thanks to you folks, i knew that it was 85% likely that i did not have hsv 2, so i opted for the WB test (5 months after exp.). i tested negative for WB. i had prior herpeselect tests in the past that were neg. like it has been said before, it will bound around all over the spectrum from time to time within negative and low positive.
i guess they sell more valtrex this way because my doctor didn't even aknowledge tell me about WB and i wasn't going to argue with him...i had this place. he was like, you have it, take precaution. for any of you out there, get the WB done. the herpeselect is not reliable at all as far as low positive readings are concerned.
I am trying to contact that partner and check it out. From continued reading on MedHelp, the newest research shows that a negative HSV -1 and positive HSV -2 of 1.1 or higher does indicate HSV 2.
I will likely test again at a different clinic next week and if i'm still in the gray area, i will get the western blot done.
Thank you petal130!
A one time encounter is low risk. Has your partner been tested to know their own herpes status?
Grace will most likely comment on your test results, but 1.1 equivocal I believe is as good as negative.