Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

PAPP-A-results

Hi

Just came back from the doctor and we are a little bit scared....

PAPP-A is 0.26 MoM and I know that is significantly low (lowest than the 3rd or even the 1st percentile)

f-hCG is 1.28, NT is 1.4 and due age is 37. They calculated us a risk of 1:170 for DS but... I don't know, I do not find it relaxing at all...

What about the very low levels of PAPP-A? What is its specificity as a prognostic marker???

4 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
377493 tn?1356502149
As far as I know PAPP-A on it's own is not necessarily a prognostic marker.  It is the ratio between the f-hgc (free beta) and the PAPP-A that has contributed to your 1:170 results.

That's the whole thing with the first trimester screen.  No single factor is a strong indicator of anything.  It is the combination of factors...the ratio between the two hormones combined with age and soft markers.  You can double check with your OB (and I would encourage you to do so as I am not a medical professional), but I don't think you can take any one single number of marker on it's own as an indication of anything.  Also, it is extremely important to remember that none of these tests are diagnostic.  The only reason for these tests is to help you determine whether you would like diagnostic testing which is invasive and carries certain risks that these tests do not.

All the best to you.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Thank you for your kind and specific response.
But, as a single prognostic marker, what is the specificity of PAPP-A? Our result is extremely low - so low as it is seen in less than 2% of the normal fetuses...
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Thank you for your kind and specific response.
But, as a single prognostic marker, what is the specificity of PAPP-A? Our result is extremely low - so low as it is seen in less than 2% of the normal fetuses...
Helpful - 0
377493 tn?1356502149
Hi there.  These tests are confusing aren't they. At my first trimester screen, I had a result of 1:13 for DS, and my son is completely typical.

Here is how the blood test works (or at least how my perinatologist explained it to me).

What they are looking for is not the actual number itself, but the ratio between free beta and Papp-A.  The greater the ratio, the higher the odds.  This is combined with your age, and then the soft markers they look for such as a thicker then average nuchal fold, shorter then average femur bone, etc. (surprisingly, they don't factor in presence or absence of a nasal bone in the equation).

This test is absolutely not diagnostic.  It calculates your odds, and that is it.  The entire purpose of it is to help you determine whether or not you would like to have more invasive testing like amnio done which is diagnostic.  

If they did the blood alone, or just the soft markers alone (such as NT), the results in terms of your odds would be much different.  None on their own is a good indicator.  

As I said, my results came back 1:13 and I did opt for amnio.  My son is now 2 years old and completely and totally typical.  I personally had a good experience with the amnio, and the peace of mind I got finding out all was well was really important for me.

1:170 are excellent odds.  You have less then a 1% chance.  I know it's scary, but once you put that number into perspective, it might help you to relax a bit.  All the best to you.
Helpful - 0
Have an Answer?

You are reading content posted in the Pregnancy 35 and Older Community

Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
Get information and tips on how to help you choose the right place to deliver your baby.
Get the facts on how twins and multiples are formed and your chance of carrying more than one baby at a time.
Learn about the risks and benefits of circumcision.
What to expect during the first hours after delivery.
Learn about early screening and test options for your pregnancy.
Learn about testing and treatment for GBS bacterium.