No, I see no need for you to seek testingfor possible rectal infection. EWH
Just to clarify, you don't think that as of now it is necessary for me to be tested rectally for STDs?
Thank you so much for your help, I really appreciate you putting my mind at ease.
Welcome to our Forum. Your questions are good ones and your logic is right on target. In general, any STD can be transmitted through receptive rectal sex. Thus the list of possible infections includes diseases such as gonorrhea and chlamydia, lesions diseases such as HPV, herpes and syphilis, and blood borne diseases such as hepatitis B and HIV. In each instance, the tests typically used to diagnose these infections as genital infections (i.e. rectal swabs for gonorrhea and chlamydia, rectal PAP smears for HPV, blood tests for syphilis and HIV) also work for rectal infections.
In your specific case, the risk from an single exposure over two years ago is low. HIV and syphilis would show up in a blood tests. The risk of gonorrhea and chlamydia are low since you were exposed more often genitally and have been tested negative at the genital site. From a practical perspective, I see no need for you to be tested for rectal infection however, in the future, following rectal exposures, testing is certainly reasonable.
I realize this response is a bit convoluted, providing both general information ( first paragraph of my response) and answers specifically for you. I hope this helps. EWH
Just to clarify, I'm mostly concerned with bacterial STDs because I am under the impression that blood born diseases are not only present in certain areas.