A related discussion,
hi was started.
I would like to know these question too By inactive, do you mean latent? Or is latent syphilis still considered an active disease? wondering . Thank doc.
By inactive, do you mean latent? Or is latent syphilis still considered an active disease? wondering
Yes. In that circumstance the negative RPR proves the person does not have syphilis. Syphilis is not your problem. You clearly are obsessing about a zero-chance risk, probably out of some sort of misplaced guilt or anxiety going back 6 years. Sounds like you need counseling about it.
Doc, I have one more question, I promise this will be my last question. If a person has syphilis for 6 years without treatment when person took the RPR blood test for Syphilis would the RPR be able to show that the person its infected with syphilis?
Chancres do not look like pimples, and pimples of the penis are quite common. And syphilis is very rare in the US (and most industrialized countries) except in a few subpopulations, mainly gay men and poor minority populations in the southeast. (Syphilis is totally absent in 80% of all US counties.) And if you were infected, you can be sure you would have a positive blood test. The RPR often becomes negative over time, but that's because the disease becomes inactive; it is very rare to have active syphlis with a negative RPR.
Bottom line: there is no way you have syphilis.
Regards-- HHH, MD