The combination of the lack of lesions and two negative blood tests is solid, totally believable evidence that you do not have syphilis. For you to continue to be concerned about a disease for which you are at low risk because it is so very rare and for which the tests are so good is more a manifestation of your anxiety over the exposure you describe than a realistic possibility. Believe your results.
the RP{R is just as reliable as the VDRL.
You do not need further testing. EWH
By lesions I meant sores. The problem with trying to attribute your pimples to syphilis is thathtere are so many causes of pimples that unless your pimples are accompanied by a positive syphilis test, you cannot attribute them to secondary syphilis. I repeat, secondary syphilis is very, very rare. There really is no reason for you to be concnerned. EWH
Thanks for your answer. It´s very confident and it will help me get over the anxiety.
Since english is not my mother toung I might misunderstand the term "lesions". May I ask if you by "lack of lesions" mean that I didn´t have an obvious primary sore in my mouth?
Is the symptoms I described of suspected secondary stage not considered to be lesions?