I see. My shock at my own, shall we call it, naivete, for believing that this contrast medium had FDA approval, and my thought that there may well be women who would like to know this, and might well want to contact legislators, etc., to request that the FDA weigh in on the use of it, is inappropriate? There is strength in numbers. A lone voice usually means little.
Well, before I am permanently banned from the site, let me throw in my 'surprise' that MRI is weighted quite low for the evaluation of nonpalpable breast masses; an issue here that is causing morning waking with the first thought - how much will the physicians involved pursue this before consensus is secured. How much damange to body in psyche will there be before one can wake in the morning and not wonder where the expert radiologist is located that might clear this mess up in a few minutes.
http://www.dcamedical.com/webdocuments/appropriteness-criteria-non-palpable-breast-mass.pdf
This seems to be a subject that you should be discussing with someone associated with the FDA .... our Community here is strictly a pt. to pt. forum with questions/concerns and opinions or answers from those who have had similar experiences.
I well understand that various drugs are used for off-label purposes. I understand that, if it's a matter of life or death, we'll do what looks like it might work. I do, however, believe that greater attention must be given to ensure that any drug we take, or equipment used in diagnosis, will be in our best interest, and that the FDA must take a stronger position in these matters.