I'd be the first to agree that most of our gov't is top heavy with paper shufflers, administrators, and administrative assistants. The problem is, that after you clean house and you have the money you need, where do you find the people to come in and do the actual work that needs doing? We expect people to acquire massive student debt to become doctors, nurses, and physical therapists. Any suggestion of providing a free education to those who want it would invoke hand wringing and cries of 'creeping socialism'. And we've reached a point of diminishing returns in expecting people from other countries to come and empty our bedpans, start IVs, and diagnose our illnesses. My neurologist back in Texas is originally from South Asia, has practiced here for many years, and is topnotch. My current neuro' is a more recent immigrant and not nearly the same caliber. We seem to be scraping the bottom of the barrel there. It's the same problem that I see us running into in universal healthcare for the rest of the country. Too many people, not enough resources.
This is why I choose to look at the VA problem from the 'supply side' of the issue. Quit putting our people in harm's way unless absolutely necessary. And certainly not just so Boeing or Halliburton can show a profit to their stockholders.
The VA $ucks. Your "among other things" have as much to do with the situation as does funding. The thing is completely mismanaged from the top to the bottom.
The funding is a simple issue. American politicians feel they are far more important than our fighting men and women, that's why they cut funding to the VA and write themselves in for raises and proudly accept health care benefits that are second to none. "Serve their country"... BS. Readjust the pay scale, redistribute some of their salaries right off the top and you'll see some of the funding issues get cleared up. Secondly, clean house amongst the health care providers at the VA. Pay attention to fraud and get rid of it. The VA should only be concerned with the health of our veterans and it should NOT be a political tool, ever!
"The issue at hand would seem to be the fact that the VA is (among other things) underfunded." This was a high priority issue when it was discussed back in 07... so much of a high priority issue that we are just now getting around to it.... yeah, lets sit and discuss this, shall we?
The issue at hand would seem to be the fact that the VA is (among other things) underfunded. Discussing the reasons why there are more clients than there are funds wouldn't seem to be a terrible digression.
".... the VA is a mess and it stayed that way after Obama criticized the former president on it"
That was kind of the meat of the original subject. Then, as it normally does around here, people started blaming people about the wars and other things.....
If I had to hazard a guess, I'd bet this thread resembles DC and all of the BS that happens there. Pick a side, throw BS around, blame someone else... if you are doing all of that, you don't have any time to address the issue at hand.
The VA still $ucks. That is still an issue and it was one that we were told that would be addressed. It hasn't, until maybe now. (The President said he was getting on it.) He can still save some face IF he does something about this. But...
But the people who made the final decision to go to war (some Democrats included) used the same intelligence to make the decision (and not hate media).
I personally hate all hate media--- anything extremely political with a clear agenda is something I avoid. Going in either direction. So, I agree that I am not a fan of that but like ALL things, people use media to make their case (Obama being no different. He personally asked actors and entertainers to talk up his healthcare plan on twitter and things like that for him to make his case and present the information from his side . . . among many other things that are just like that. I trust very few politicians these days from either party.).
Whether the War on Iraq was right or wrong, the VA is a mess and it stayed that way after Obama criticized the former president on it. I guess whomever runs next can criticize Bush AND Obama.
If it was a miserable, regrettable mistake, perhaps we should have waited until we had better intelligence about the true situation before mobilizing. To me it feels as though people's fears were exploited to jump into this. Which comes back to Vance's question about "hate media".
The way I use the phrase is: any form of print, video, or audio communication that uses fear, prejudice, or ignorance to manipulate people.