Denise, an LMP Oct 27th suggests ovulation Nov 10th. Sperm from Nov 7th would still have been viable. A due date about August 3rd should convince you it was guy B.
I meant, at what number of weeks did you get your first ultrasound, and what date did the doctor give you as an estimated due date from the baby's ultrasound data?
Then guy A can't be the dad, August 3 points to November 10 for conception, as the other poster already mentioned. So no matter if "people say" they had a period when pregnant, what "people say" doesn't apply to your case. Don't fret. :)
Having a baby earlier than expected does not change when the baby was conceived. Are you saying you had the baby on July 3 instead of her estimated due date of August 3? And I assume that your doc mentioned she was early?
Also, you mentioned that your first ultrasound was in week 5 or week 6 of pregnancy. If you had the baby four weeks early, that is not a big deal. But if the baby had been conceived four weeks earlier than you thought, the tech would not have told you that you were only 5 or 6 weeks along.
(By "that is not a big deal," I meant, it is not very unusual for someone to have a baby early. It happens all the time. It doesn't say anything about when the baby was conceived.)
Yes! I had her July 3. She told me that she was early, but they did the last ultrasound and said that everything was still measuring correct. I was just a little nervous.
A friend of mine got into a car crash late in her pregnancy, and it triggered labor. Does that mean the accident reached back in time and changed the date the baby was conceived? No, it just means that the baby came early. Try to relax and be logical. If the first ultrasound said the baby was not very far along, that is the one to go with.