Dear Doctor,
I am 37, male, I got my eyes examined few days ago, several retinal holes detected in my right eye and retinal photocoagulation was recommended. After viewing your comments in this web site I decided to go for a second opinion today and the doctor said I was only retinal degeneration, no retinal holes were found.
The first eye doctor examined my eyes by Slit lamp, then Opthalmoscope plus magnifying lens, finally Slit lamp plus supplementary lens which attached onto my eye balls and retinal holes were detected.
The second one just used Slit lamp only without any supplementary lens onto my eyes and commented my retinal is just degenerating, few parts are getting thinner and no treatment to be needed.
Certainly, both examinations were done after pupil dilated and my questions are:
1) What are the procedures of a normal detailed eye examination should be ? What does it cover? and what equipments to be used ?
2) Can the retina be clearly seen by just Slit lamp without any supplementary lens after pupil dilation ?
3) I am very confused of the results now. Any comment you have for both examinations ? or should I go for a 3rd opinion ?
Thanks so much in advance and look forward to your reply soon.
Ray