None of those Rx's would affect your test result. You are conclusively negative.
thank you very much for your help. its been scary but yet very informative reading your comments and answers to so many troubled souls. same goes to Dr HHH.... Lesson learned. - Conclusive Q
Teak,
Learned the female is an exotic dancer. I would consider this a high risk exposure. Is my 85 day EIA HIV AB screen at 85 days still reliable?
You are conclusively negative.
Teak. A Question. What is the difference/significance/reason behind people saying: 12 weeks, 13 weeks, 3, months, 90 days, etc? Why the variance and why isn't one of those commonly used terms the sandard. What happens if you're a day before 12 weeks? Some info out there can be misleading so that's why I'm asking. You seem like a stickler for CDC guidelines but 12 weeks isn't 3 months. Anything you can offer to my curiosity here? And thanks again for your time
· Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Could it be known exposures that change windows change? Like known sex with + person or known contamination with + blood
My question isn't debating your stance. I'm merely asking the reasoning behind differences in information