* meant intends them TO. See, I just did it!
There are literally thousands of threads in which the doctors say unprotected vaginal sex is a risk. He must have meant PROTECTED sex. Fingers don't always type what the mind intends them too.
That must be a mis-print.Unprotected vaginal sex is a risk of hiv transmission.
I have just read this on the doctors forum : it is pretty much impossible to catch hiv through unprotected vaginal sex.
Is that a misprint or do we now have a medical consensus - from a expert in the field - that u/p hetero vaginal penetration
represents virtually none of the cases who test positive for hiv here or anywhere?
thats got to be reassuring for many people
as some people were aware of their partner being seropositive
99.9 percent of the people that post here didn't have a risk. The others that did tested negative.
well now...wouldnt it be ridiculous for us to "think" that we know if someone tested negative or positive WITHOUT them telling us.
so i would think it would be safe to ASSUME the poster is speaking of those who DID REPORT their status.
DUH
i think that most of the anxiety cases on here, with legitimate concerns, ie the ones who indulged in a risky act , do actually come back to say they tested negative
did all people who asked question came to tell u their final conclusive test ????
"we cant know" ? ?
you've been here 8 days...geeeeeeeeeez
True first question
true second question
true third question
we can't know