thanks will let u know what happens at my 12th week mark
Its an excellent result and it won't change at 12 weeks.
so after all comments no need to worry....one question teak how reliable is the clearview 1/2 stat pak at 8 weeks 3 days...friend who gave me oral stated he just test neg at that time
Window periods are not different. One is factual and the other is not. 3 months post exposure is the guidelines set by the manufacture of the test and approved by the FDA.
Their window periods are different aswell--it's up to the poster who they want to go with.Everyone has a choise.
how can you be consistent,if the quotes from the docters on this same forum ar not?
and to ask dr Garcia i have to pay for my question,so let he explain when he reads this right?
Then ars symtomps, ask TO ask:
Ars rashes copy many viral disease rashes as scarlett fever/measles etc and can effects any part of the body,but mostly 70% on the trunk/torso.
People are divided about the whole oral sex is it a risk debate,but the majority say no it's not a risk & have controlled studies to back up what they say.
take it up with dr garcia...this forum is consistent of what is and isn't a risk
Dr Garcia,says every time on the freedomhealth site
Hiv risk due oral with ejaculation is 1:2500 if you swallow from a Hiv+man with a high viral load.
So a contradiction from Dr Garcia??
in the public HIV Prevention forum of MedHelp, TEAK and the other moderators maintain that oral sex in all forms is a zero risk activity. Would you agree with this assessment?
I TOTALLY AGREE / DR GARCIA
You had no risk--you are not having ARS symptoms & 6 months is wrong as an HIV window period.
You never had an exposure. Your health dept. is totally off base.
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Wow ! i should be ok? anyway the guy that did oral and scraped my penis head causing it to bleed.yesterday he went to the health department and at 8 weeks after my exposure he was HIV Neg he stated and he can prove it.Question at 8 weeks how conclusive or rely on HIV 1/2 stat pak antibodies at that time.?they say at the health dept you have to wait 6 months for conclusive results.
i have no sudden interest in symptoms.
the poster said that he had a rash on the left side of his stomach and you told him that it was in the wrong place...that it was always on the trunk / torso and limbs.
all i did was tell you that you were wrong...that the abdomen / stomach is part of the torso.
then...as usual...you start spewing out things that have nothing to do with the wrong information that you gave. (this is evidenced by your above comment)
all you had to do was say that you were wrong...that you made a mistake. didn't need all the off subject comments that followed.
You believe that symptoms are never HIV specific so I don't know why the sudden interest.Did you know that most newly infected people will experience very high fevers--around 70% of them.This is a very important stat.
as usual...has nothing to do with what you were called out on...geeeez
you have stated several times that the abdomen / stomach is not part of the torso / trunk...and that is simply NOT true.
HIV rash can be found on the upper torso & limbs--HIV specialists words not mine.
"Trunk--torso upper chest not lower abdomen--stomach."
your words...not mine !
I know where the Torso is and I also know the OP had no risk.There is n need to go on with this.The OP is not experiencing an ARS rash.
Trunk--torso upper chest not lower abdomen--stomach??? Totally incorrect. You need to brush up on your human anatomy.
in the public HIV Prevention forum of MedHelp, TEAK and the other moderators maintain that oral sex in all forms is a zero risk activity. Would you agree with this assessment?
I TOTALLY AGREE / DR GARCIA
I will not insult you back because that's not my style.I know the facts about HIV & I really don't care what other people like yourself think of me.I am here to assist people as best I can & so far I am doing a good job.Thanks for the compliment actually--Rainman was highly intelligent.
What are you talking about, I know the risks you clown, I haven't even asked. You should change the second part of your name from "lover" to "man" and get over yourself.
Maybe you should visit the body.com where they will tell you that the HIV window period is 6 months--that oral sex is a risk & that you can contract HIV from a toilet.Maybe they will make you feel better.