To clarify what I was saying was in this case blood would not have been a risk. As Emily said sufficient amount to enter the blood stream, deep muscle/tissue would be a risk. But not from a superficial cut on a hand and/or penis.
Hi everyone -
We just want to clarify this. We can't speak for Vance, but assume this was a typo, and he meant to type that handjobs weren't a risk, not that blood wasn't a risk. Blood is indeed a risk for HIV when a sufficient amount enters your bloodstream (not the case here).
Thanks,
Emily
As Vance already advised you, you never had a risk.
Sorry Vance...you are just great
Sorry my answer is not good enough for you.
If you had no risk then why would you need to test?
Thanks a lot.. This forum helps a lot. I never had even a protective penetrative sex for years. All i had is a hand job and when I noticed a bleeding running blood, i started freaking again. I hope I'm safe. Do I need to test? I know anxiety is the biggest disease.
No it is not a risk. Blood is not a risk for HIV.