If your unprotected sex was heterosexual, and you don't know your partner's status, your chance of contracting HIV is 1 in a 1,000,000. HIV is rarely transmitted through oral or vaginal sex female to male. Your negative test result at 4 weeks is a very good indication that you did not contract HIV in the exposure you describe. Your 3 month test is just a formality. I would not expect your result to change.
Is it at least a fair indicator of being negative? Confused on why he did it if it does tell for sure. Or is it just highly accurate but not definitive.
RNA not a stand alone test, he was right to suggest an antibody test.
Unprotected sex. Drunken mistake. I just want to know if the 4 week rna test being negative is that accurate at 4 weeks. Doc refused to give numbers