* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Since it's been 3 months post-"exposure", you can get tested and get your conclusive negative result to prove it.
Hello there, emegency, i am almost 13 weeks now from the last exposure and i am having a fever and flu. Is this any indication for anything? Please let me know!
"No and it wouldn't have mattered if her tongue was bleeding or not."
Yes my question is why does it not matter if her tongue is bleeding or not as bloo from her tongue could get into my penis head. I understand about the saliva part already.
Try rereading the replies that you have given instead of posting. That question was answered.
by Teak , 7 hours ago
No, saliva contain over a dozen different enzymes and proteins that inhibits HIV transmission.
Yes teak i do understand that part
however the part that i am concern about was the part u said that even her tongue was bleeding it didnt post any risk. why? doesnt it make it riskier if the blood from the tongue from her piercings gets into my penis head?
No, saliva contain over a dozen different enzymes and proteins that inhibits HIV transmission.
Actually my concern was when u said if there was blood it didn't matter why? Doesn't it pose as a risk if blood from her tongue entererd my penis head?
Oral sex does not transmit HIV. Saliva has over a dozen different enzymes and proteins that inhibit HIV transmission.
Sorry to prolong this but as an extra knowledge may i ask why does it not matter? Blood can get inside the penis head isnt that dangerous at all?
No and it wouldn't have mattered if her tongue was bleeding or not.
Yes i understand that Teak, but doesnt a pierced tongue increased the rate as in there are blood right?
Did doctors said anything abt this? I am seriously confused
Oral sex is not a risk of contracting HIV having a pierced tongue or not.
One thing I would like to add that I forgot was that I received two unprotected sex from the same prostitute in two different days. I know the risk of unprotected sex is low but the thing that freaked me out was that her tongue was pierced. How would this put me? In a medium or a high risk group? Should I get tested?
Actually i wasnt worried much about the oral sex, i was more worried about when i removed my penis from my vagina and i saw the condom rolled all the way to the top BARELY coverying my penis head. Even the russian prositute was shocked,...
Relax you are okay. You had No HIV risk. Read into the facts about oral sex. You will realize your worrieing over nothing. Move on with your life and dont stress.
Nothing else to add to what you have already been told. At no time were you ever at risk of contracting HIV.
Thank you Vance, Anyone else care to comment? i cant sleep please.
Ok, well if you never had a risk you don't need testing.
Thank you so much for your answer, should i test myself?
I tested myself using a local kit in Malaysia, www.hivtest.com.my nexus laboratory, how reliable is this kit? I tested negative with this kit at 8 weeks.... i dont know if i can rely on it or not... going crazy!
1. Protected sex is not a risk. Unprotected oral sex is not a risk
2. Condom never came off then you are fine, probably pulled that way on withdrawl
3. No risk