Dear Teak and Lizzie,
Can you comment on the green mucus..... what does it imply....any idea?
Thanks me21ddd. I feel better having discussed this.
As it's been mentioned before, HIV testing is not advised for a NO RISK exposure.
If you obtain a negative result at a month post exposure, it'll only be for your own reassurance.
Condoms reduce the risk of HIV to minimum. There are many resources that claim it's 98% effective in HIV transmission if used correctly. In fact, 2% are left out to the possibility of condom failure. Condom breakage is the reason one can not guarantee a condom protected sex will be anything but SAFE SEX.
You didn't report condom failure, so you don't need HIV testing.
Thanks everyone. I will try and put this behind me and provide my wife with the support she needs. For the last few weeks I have been a worried zombie.
fortunately...you do not need hiv testing.
Hi Lizzie
This was a drunken stupid mistake and I cannot begin to explain how consumed with guilt I am. In this case the condom did not fail and lets just say ill never put myself in this situation again.
I will get tested for any STI's at 1 month. I think this will include a hiv antibody test. If thats negative 1 month after expose should I test further or put this beyond me. I no use to anyone currentlt as the guilt and hiv anxiety have consumed me.
It's probably a one-time adventure that he won't ever do again, am I right, Mr? :)
If you've vowed to a monogamous relationship with your wife, then you should keep your promise and remain faithful.
Being in a monogamous relationship with a partner of a known negative status is THE BEST way to avoid HIV.
" My first concern is protecting my wife and unborn children."
EVER HEARD OF CONDOM FAILURE ? ? ?
If the condom didn't break, then you were PROTECTED against HIV and did NOT contract HIV.
CONDOM PROTECTED SEX = SAFE SEX = NO HIV
You never had a risk of contracting HIV. You did however have a risk of contracting other STDs.