How can u be so sure that he was mistaken about having a negative wb? I have to admit this guys posts really did make me sound the alarm and it is unfortunate if his story is false. So u maintain that oral sex is not a risk for HIV, no matter the circumstance?
The gentleman who claims to have HIV from oral sex would have fi
Ed a law suit against them if he turned positive while in reality he could gotten positive from another exposure. No one can prove how he got infected
Oral is not a risk. And when they say low risk it's due to leagle issues.
i mean, low risk implies a risk right?
so low risk and no risk is the same?
Maybe when you have several Dr's agree on the same position that it is not underestimating anything. Dr's on this site and other sites as well as other prominate Dr's who work in the HIV field.
maybe that possibility has been underestimated here and could cause a disaster un peoples lifes
you are the best :) thanks
No he did not have a positive WB, he was mistaken. If you read everything you see he said he did not have a +WB. He took a WB and then never came back.
Because the Dr's also say no risk. If you read what Dr.Hook says about the 1 in 10000...to high in his estimation and he and many others have never seen anyone get HIV from oral sex.
it would be good to know...and i keep asking myself why in this forum you say no risk and in the doctors they say low riks, 1 every 10000 exp
i just found his post with doctor Hook and he got a +WB test !!!
You can't just look at one post for the whole story. He had several negative tests, never had a WB test done, never updated his results, had inconsistancies in his stories he has told both forums.