Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

70% Magic Number?

I had two arteries blocked at 100% and stents implanted in October, 2009 at a hospital in a nearby community.  Yesterday I had another angiogram done in my community by my cardiologist, and he said that I had 60% blockage in the two arteries that were stented, and the stents installed, were undersized.  He said I would need to wait and they would do another angiogram in a couple of years to check the blockage.  I've heard the number 70% upon many occassions and it seems to be the "magic" number for any angioplasty or stent work.  Why is 70% the magic number before they will or can perform any arterials bypass type of work?  Now it just seems like I'm in a "crap" shoot waiting for two years or a heart attack which ever comes first.
3 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
367994 tn?1304953593
The 70% blockage is a guideline by the AAC./AHA. Based statistically, it may be the percentage of heart occlusion problems that causes symptoms, but it is an estimate and doesn't represent individual specifically.  My doctor is a non-interventioanal cardilogist and treats angina caused by vessel stenosis with medication.  I have had an occlusion greater than 70% for years and medication prevents any symptoms.

If medication does not effectively prevent symptoms, then according to guidelines do a stent implant, if unable to stent then bypass. The guideline is more symptom oriented than occlusion size.  Medication can open vessels, stent can brace a wider opening and bypass will effectively relieve angina structually. There maybe intevention in the event of an emergency...no choice.  
Helpful - 0
237039 tn?1264258057
I am feeling the same way.  I have a 50% blockage in an artery they say they cannot stent, so in my case I would rather wait and just take the meds and etc.  I do not want cabg.
Helpful - 0
976897 tn?1379167602
The line has to be drawn somewhere to establish if a procedure carrying risk should be performed or not. 70% was chosen because anything less can be treated (in nearly all cases) with medication. 70% and above does pose more risk of rupture and symptoms not being controlled by medication. I too was amazed at this when told by my cardiologist, but he said nearly all patients with a 60% blockage don't even know it's there. The arteries are much larger than they need to be, giving a huge reserve. For 2 years while cardiologists were trying to decide my fate with surgical options, my left artery had a 3-5% feed. This was all the left side of my heart had to try and function. I was gardening, carrying shopping, walking over a mile every day. All thanks to medication.
Helpful - 0
Have an Answer?

You are reading content posted in the Heart Disease Community

Top Heart Disease Answerers
159619 tn?1707018272
Salt Lake City, UT
11548417 tn?1506080564
Netherlands
Learn About Top Answerers
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
Is a low-fat diet really that heart healthy after all? James D. Nicolantonio, PharmD, urges us to reconsider decades-long dietary guidelines.
Can depression and anxiety cause heart disease? Get the facts in this Missouri Medicine report.
Fish oil, folic acid, vitamin C. Find out if these supplements are heart-healthy or overhyped.
Learn what happens before, during and after a heart attack occurs.
What are the pros and cons of taking fish oil for heart health? Find out in this article from Missouri Medicine.
How to lower your heart attack risk.