I don't think so cure for hdv may be treated as orphan drug, because it's a lof of people infected to test on. I think we should aim for fast track procedure.
i dont know fast track. is it requiring little money and small trials for approval?
First one needs to await the stability of the HDV CLEARANCE after stopping the treatment. This can only be judged after at least 6 month of follow up.Currently it seems plausible that 5 out of the 11 fully treated patients might have a true SVR for hdv and hbv. But even in these cases we will need to wait and see.
If it is possible that the currently hdv neg patients that are not expected to stably seroconvert the hbsag will still have selectively lost hdv remains to be seen. It is unlikely and would represent a true sensation if possible.
Small trial is for orphan drugs I think, fast track is:
http://www.fda.gov/ForPatients/Approvals/Fast/ucm405399.htm
I wonder if hdv drug has chance for that procedure ?
So it's 15 weeks on peginf left and than 6 months of observation ?
6 month of follow up is barely enough to confirm a stable svr.
I do not b think that any agency will give approval based on 12 patients. They will, for hdv, negotiate a registration trial design with replicor.
BTW the current trial in Moldavia was NOT DESIGNED to achieve a functional cure. It's pupose was to show that the nap component was independently causing a strong, objective positive effect, BEFORE the interferon overlap.
The new trial, starting now is designed to achieve a functional cure in the hope that a full year of naps plus a simultaneous interferon or thymosin alpha treatment, all combined with TDF and with a TDF pretreatment period of 6 month, will achieve hbsag seroconversion in a high percentage of patients.
Those will be e neg patients again, but without hdv.
What is most fascinating is the thymosin alpha arm, since this has almost no side effects compared with interferon and seemed more promising in the second Bangladesh trial than interferon.