after your other comments i have to agree your doctor is good, she is doing all correc tthings
so, in my opinion the ALT increase is not do to the Viread, actualy Viread stop the increase (or it was only a coincidence).
65 in May, 73 in March -> a increase without Viread in one month
73 in march -> 93 in may -> a increase but posible not to viread (we have 2 mouth )
93 in may -> 93 in August -> same level under Viread (2 mounth), no increase, so we can say that viread some how stop the increase.
maybe is to mathematical, but also this option desired to be mentioned
At the end of the day, is it good or bad if your body got rid of the hbeag?
better positive because you can respond much better to drugs and also because on hbeag pos hbv usually hasn t escape your immune system by mutations yet...so many more chances to clear
hbsag quant monitor every 3-6 months can clear what is happening with infection and immune system so i'd refer mainly to this test...hbvdna and alt just complementary to hbsag quant
Both ALTcounts were before Viread:
65 in Febuary
73 in March
First Altcount under Viread in May: 93
Second Altcount under Viread in August: still 93
ALT in April and before: Between 65 and 73 - do you have 2 ALT measure in April ?
If yes the first one was 65 and the second one was 73 ?
If yes, maybe you should consider and discuss with your doctor that the ALT was "naturally" increasing and the increase is not to Viread.
Since I am new to the topic is my count of hbsag high and therefore good? But I am not hbeag positive I am negative. Speaking of, what I still do not clearly understand because of all the misleading information in the internet. At the end of the day, is it good or bad if your body got rid of the hbeag?