Hello lovely people,
I'm wondering how important is it to have a biopsy even though I already started tx? I had a biopsy in 2004 and I was stage 1 fibrosis(?). For some reason, I thought being geno 3 meant I was ok and wouldn't progress, and could even continue to drink wine. I was so shocked at having Hep C, I think I chose to bury my head in the sand and act as though there was nothing to worry about or take any preventive steps. Fast forward to now...head out of the sand, doc last year highly recommended tx because of my genotype and low VL (300,000). He said a biopsy wasn't necessary if I decided to do tx. Now after reading so much about Hep C and effects of drinking alcohol, knowing I was having wine with dinner 3 to 4 nights a week (1 to 2 glasses) for the last 6 years, I wonder if I should have had a biopsy to see what state my liver is in. I no longer drink alcohol btw.
So, since I'm on tx and a Rapid Responder (UND @ 4 weeks), do you think a biopsy is a good idea or do I not have to worry since I have a decent chance of being SVR?
Many thanks,
June