I don't know why the doctor would say that.
I will say that through this process I am amazed at how little healthcare professionals know about HSV. I feel as though my knowledge from reading through this forum was greater than the doctors. For example, he seemed surprised that I would question the timeframe for testing, and assured me that 4 weeks was enough time to have passed/
I cannot think why the doctor would suspect herpes. If you are negative for HSV then upon infection you would have a lot and different symptoms to a single pimple and bump.
It is too early for a blood test for HSV for you if you have indeed been infected recently. It may be better for your husband to test to see what risk there really is here, you may find there is little to be concerned about.
I saw the doctor who suspects it is in fact herpes. My best guess is that transmission would have occurred on 9/17 (I was also intimate with my husband that day).
The doctor rigorously rubbed the swab on the almost healed lesion. Would the swab show anything at that point in healing? I am still symptomatic, itching and having some discomfort. Also, he tested for HSV 1 and HSV 2, through blood work. Is that long enough for antibodies to show within the blood?
I feel like it was coincidence. Herpes needs direct skin to skin contact.
Also, got a pap aggravate something like that? Or, would the timing be just coincidence?
Thank you so much for your fast response.
After about 5 days, the white head transitioned to a raised bump, similar in size to a pencil eraser, that was flesh colored. I was worried that the transitioned bump may be as herpes appears.
Doctors offices are very clean. Gynecologists now use disposable instruments for that kind of thing now.
But what you describe sounds more like a yeast infection. Herpes wouldn't appear as a white head. It wouldn't contain puss. A herpes blister contains clear liquid.