Her answer brought it to the top of the forum, which is normal. The question (for me) is: Why does "Search" (@top of forum page) return so many very old threads at the top of results?
I'll try to write a quick tutorial later today and put it on a separate thread. For now, I'm guessing it was Marcia's new answer that brought this particular old question back to the future.
MH's Search function has always mystified me. I am sure someone understands how it indexes & selects threads to display, and in what sequence. HELLO, TECH PEOPLE? A simple explanation or link to one? Thnx!
I don't know but glad it did, I enjoyed Quix's comments and it does describe my urologist! So I won't do the test when he pushes for it as my last visit indicated I know more about MS than he does!
? it is now 2/13 - why did this post from 2010 show up @ the top of the forum questions? How does this work? Very strange!
- Marcia
I feel your pain/anxiety/frustration! I'm just starting to deal w/ the whole urology stuff and hate it. My urologist didn't even tell me what was going on w/ the cystoscopy. I was furious. It hurt and I wasn't expecting it. Next is my urodynamic test.. Reading your post, I wonder what the point of the whole thing is - doesn't seem like you have gotten any satisfaction out of the test. By spasms do you mean kinda extreme cramping? I have mild cramping on my R side - where I know I have cysts in my R kidney. Not comfortable and very disconcerting.
I definitely agree that you should get a referral from someone who knows an MS Urologist. There is no way that I would let someone operate on me w/out a second opinion - One step @ a time.
Good luck - hopefully all these posts will help you.
----Marcia
Quix- I got the referral from my OB/GYN. My husband said, he thought he heard that he was just an OB/GYN with them in their office, and recently got his specialty in the URO part. He was nice, but I'm not sure if he knew what to think of me. I'm not sure of your other question..but it was occurring when they were filling my bladder with fluid, and asking me when I would seek out a bathroom. When they started to fill it, it would go from flat-line on the computer, to strong waves of spastic reaction, to flat-line again, to quivers. This happened through out the filling process. Even with a little fluid, it was going crazy, and then back to normal. On certain days I do lose urine when this happens, but that day I had catheters in so, I'm not sure if I did or not. Sometimes, I'm unaware that I do it unless I feel that warm sensation.
My bladder is still fighting me off and on since the urodynamics testing. I'll be fine one day, and other days, my bladder is spastic all day. It did not like this test.
Carol- I think I will get a second opinion. I think I might let him fix my prolapse first, and then after I fully recover, seek someone else who knows more about the neurological end of it. That way, there should only be one issue, instead of two. There has to be a reason for me to just let loose in the mornings, to have that urge to go "right now", and the spasms that I've been getting. I think it has to be linked to, whatever it is, I have neurological wrong with me. I've only been doing those things for 6-7 months. The stress incontinence has been longer.
I would definetely get a second opinion and get it with someone who knows a thing or two about MS. We are in a class by ourselves when it comes to any type of medical problems. At least that's how I feel about it. Let us know what you do decide to do.
I'll be praying,
Carol
This guy isn't very educated on neurological problems. He specializes in structural problems (stress incontinence) and in making money. I think your instincts are right. Now that doesn't mean you shouldn't correct the prolapses - 'cause nothing is supposed to be falling out. If it is done well, then the effect of the neuro problems "might" be lessened.
However, it is possible that the neurological problems should be considered in planning the surgery, I don't know. But, I am always leery of letting someone operate whose primary goal seems to get you into the OR. Urologists ARE surgeons primarily.
He sounds undereducated for your purposes. Where did you get the referral for him? You might contact a neuro clinic, a spinal injury clinic, or an MS clinic and find if they have a uro-gyne associated with them that might be better versed in the "neurology" of the problem, rather than just the repair problems. He should have been able to discuss fully the extent to which your bladder spasmed inappropriately.
Was it spasming out of sequence with the relaxation of the external sphincter? One of the commonest neurologic problems in MS is Detrusor Sphincter Dyssynergia (the bladder wall muscle working out of rhythm with the tightening and relaxation of the outlet sphincter.)
Quix
Thanks for your input...I didn't think of that. My brain isn't working to well. I had a really rough couple of weeks (emotionally).
Thanks
That's pretty much what my husband said ($$$). It was the uro-gyn I just saw. I do want to get the surgery because I do believe it will help some issues. I don't like having to deal with my recent prolapse bladder. It happened in December.
But I've read that if I do have urge incontinence issues, surgery will not do a thing for this. I do believe I have this problem too. The symptoms of urge incontinence describe me to a tee.
I was just disappointed in the fact that he didn't address the bladder spasms, that I have complained about in the first place, and the loss of urine in the morning without even knowing it's occurring, until it's too late. That to me is disturbing. I already knew about the stress incontinence...didn't need a test to show me that.
I don't know. This is something about which I've just begun readding within the past month or so, and haven't learned much, but it sounds like this doc is more interested in doing $$$urgery than actually finding and treating the cause of the problems, IMHO. I didn't catch this from your post: is this a urologist of whom you write?
Hi, SB. I have had all the urodynamics tests, but I really can't help with your questions. They told me mine were abnormal, showed me the graphs and so on. They didn't say which parts were normal, as I imagine some were. I'd think it would be highly unlikely to have
*everything* malfunctioning.
If you haven't yet, get the written report from your tests. Then spend some time on the web checking on the doc's wording. That might make things more clear.
ess