I recently went to the dermatologist to have my moles examined. After 2 or 3 mins she gave me the all clear and said nothing to worry about and everything was fine. This was the very first time I had a full body mole check. Im almost 29 yrs.
I had noticed 3 moles change over time, particularly during my 2 pregnancies. I have approx. 30 moles altogether. I'm half asian. These had always caught my attention as they always looked like spots of dirt. They changed so slowly that i supposed they looked the same until i paid close attention to them only 2 weeks ago, which made me get my checkup.
They have all the signs of a melanoma, ABCE. However she only asked to keep an eye on 2 very small black freckles.
Ive had a number of sunburns in my teens and early 20's, as well as a handful of tanning bed sessions in my life (regrettably). It wasn't until 24 that i woke up and went cold turkey with tanning. Afterwards babies came along and you know how it goes. So I deeply regret now not having seen a derma much earlier.
SO my anxiety hangs on whether she could've missed a late stage melanoma. Would i have had symptoms by now? Why didn't she insist on a biopsy to be sure? My husband insists to just listen to the professionals. However it didn't sit well with me and in this past week i've read so much information and stories on melanoma. It's detracting much of my attention away from normal life.
I have made another appointment, a different dermatologist who i can't see for another 3 weeks! I can't understand how people slowly develop melanoma in their 50's, 60's and 70's having spent all their days in the sun. And others developing this in their teens and 20's, all of a sudden, it becoming fatal. To be honest i don't know whether to be confident in my first examination and not to think much else of it for another 6 months, or question her conclusions.
Please for my sanity (and my husbands nerves), your professional insight would be very much appreciated!
Thank you