Nutrition Health Chat: Tuesday, Dec. 8th, 5-6 PM Eastern. Learn how vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients affect your health. Free live Q&A. Join us!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
This patient support community is for discussions relating to eye care, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal detachment, eye infections, misaligned eyes, intra-ocular implants, refractive surgery (LASIK and CK), glasses, contact lenses, amblyopia, eye injuries, dry eyes, ocular allergy, eye pain and discomfort, pediatric eye disorders, eyelid and tearduct surgery, poor eyesight, and eye surgery.
I just started working fulltime in an office two weeks ago and am having increasing problems with my vision and headaches, which I feel is related to the frequency of the fluorescent lighting. Since I've never spent so long under fluorescent lighting, this is a new experience for me. I have spells where my eyes go strange, not fuzzy because I can still focus, but strange because I can't see clearly, like a skewed TV screen in a way. Difficult to describe. After the vision disruption, which in some spells lasts about 20 minutes, I have a headache which can last for hours. When the spell passes, I'm normalNormal saline flush again with no vision problems.
I need to know how I can protect myself from this negative lighting environment so I can keep working to pay my keep.
I hear that 25% of the population suffers with sensitivity to fluorescent lighting, which is way too many for any healthy society. I think it's important that we keep incandescent lighting around for those who are made ill by fluorescent lighting.
Lighting engineers have spent millions and millions of dollars and thousands of hours designing lighting that is safeSafe driving for teens Safe sex , economical, friendly to the environment and that absolutely will not damage eyes.
I also have a sensitivity to fluorescent lighting, my eyes get so tired I can hardly stand it. As soon as I leave the room I'm fine. I've noticed this for years. I wear a light pair of reflective sunglasses, and it helps. If you wear glasses I'd get a pair of lightly darkened reflective glasses for work and play. I don't so I use regularRegular insulin sunglasses.
JCH MD doesn't seem to be aware of the issue. Besides, he can't spell fluorescent... :)
I disagree with your comment that the lights would have been abolished years ago. We all just remain untreated and very live live limitted by our situation. I am unable to be around flourescent lights because they cause vision disruption, dizziness, and after long exposure (especially to the older style) loss of consciousness. Dr.s just shrug and tell me that it is strange or look at me as if I am crazy. We can't all be hypochondriacs.
For those who suffer as I do, there are discussions and websites out there trying to bring light to this subject if you google it. Sunglasses do help. It is embaressing to wear sunglasses to work or the grociery store, but they do help. I am looking for non-prescription, u-v protectant contacts in hopes that they will help enough to enable me to finish graduate and medical schoolPreschooler development Preschooler test Preschooler test or procedure preparation School age child development School age test or procedure preparation School-age children development. Good luck to all
It is an attitude Just Like Yours that pushed me to near suicideSuicide and suicidal behavior over this issue. Just because it isn't something you recognize or were taught in medical school, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It is doctors like yourself who "poo-poo" such complaints (because it doesn't fit in with your paradigm) that it is neither reported, nor acted upon.
What I learned about fluorescent light is that not only is the 60-cycling is obnoxious (yes) but that the light spectrum that it heavily requires (visible blue) which is responsible for the light's brightness and excites the retinas improving visibility - but is also fatiguing for some guaranteed. It happens. It doesn't help to deny it and doesn't let your patients feel as if you are their advocate, as I believe you are supposed to be. Or maybe ought to be.
I have had lighting engineers tell me that you have to be 40 feet away from fluroescent to not be affected by it. Was also told by these people that most lighting engineers are too lazy to do the geometry that would actually result in more appropriate placement of fluorescent fixtures. One 40-watt fluroescent tube is = to 150 watts incandescent. I asked a PG&E conservation expert, just in general, how many watts would you put overheard in an office. He said... "100, 150" and I then asked him why would you put the equivalent of 600 watts (4 tubes as was common at the time) in fluorescent installations. Not to mention spaced every few feet. Especially when you are trying to conserve energy? Why use 4X the amount of necessary overhead light. He had no answer, but got back to me and said I could not use his quote in the report I was writing.
Why indeed? Well, using only 1 40-watt tube overhead would create a sickly gray light. There has to be more used in order to create what would simulate decent lighting.
The result is excessive (for some) overhead lighting and This Is Only My Opinion, but based upon my own experience, the excessive lighting overworks the retinas (of some) which in turn overwork the eye's muscles, extending to surrounding facial muscles and into the neck as well.
Since it doesn't happen to everyone, doesn't mean it doesn't happen to some and herein lies the problem with medical "science": they only work on averages. What affects the average person and then operate from there. Unfortunately, if your diagnosis doesn't fit in with this average, they are wont to tell you it is all in your head.
Clue: I learned this in interior design. Appropriate lighting should be task specific, not glaring overhead light to accommodate a whole population. Overhead lighting should be AMBIENT, not the task.
So, Dr. Hagen, just because you don't know it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It has taken a long time since I took up this fight, but more and more and more people are realizing that fluorescent causes their headaches. There are some doctors who DO admit it.
Once I'm exposed to more than just a few minutes of fluorescent light, I will get eye pain, eye strain, and facial muscular pain. After a while, it goes to my neck as well. They ARE all connected, you see. But the eye pain, one sided, is the worst. And here is the kicker: if I am not exposed to fluorescent, I won't get any pain at all.
I do have to be careful with bright outdoor light as well, so always wear sunglasses. Always, always always. And taking care with computer use as well. But the fluorescent? Even the tiny little devil bulbs they are forcing us to use? Yes, those are also too bright for me.
Sometimes, it takes up to 4 days after exposure for the migraine to occur. So it isn't an easy, perfect little package for diagnosis. But that is what it is for me and I suspect some others as well. So have a little respect for those you diagnose as "head cases".
Not defending the opinion on indoor lighting- but I am very light sensative to the point that techs have a hard time even holding the eye open to take pics. Indoor lighting at some of the bright stores require that I wear a light yellow tinted sunglass that allows me to see a bit better yet seems to help with eye discomfort. All my light sensativity issues are related to medical conditions and side efects of intense laser surgery. If you are light sensative you may be developing mild dry eye ( you would know if severe ). Also eye fatigue seems to make the light issue worse for me. I would discuss this with your eye doc. It is true that many seem to push the light sensativity issues to the back burner because as one doc said " sometimes things we don't see and can't touch are not addressed because it just doesn't hit us like a retina tear " My everyday pain level was severe if I went outside or even shopped at a brightly lit store- now with two pair of glasses It is much less an issue. If your doc doesn't think your pain and discomfort is an issue simply tell them it is and even if they can't fix it there are ways to minimize the discomfort. ND filtered prescription sunglasses outdoors in sun ( partially sealed if you have bad dry eye ) Lightly tinted ( yellow works for me ) wrap around sunglasses inside and of course prescription so you do not strain your eyes which causes pain as well .
I certainly understand being upset about a docs non reaction to light sensativity- been there myself--if nothing else find a new doc. If your light sensativity is severe enough you will not find what you need at " supermarket" type eye centers- Full service eye clinics can usually fix you up though.
Anxiety,stress etc can also cause increased sensitivity to light,sound,touch etc
Its true that some people may be allergic to fluorescent lights,but we have to consider that millions of people all around the world uses this technology one way or another like display in computer,tv,mobile phones etc & most people are comfortable with it,so when such a sensitivity problem arise we have to look into eye problems,psychological problems like severe anxiety,stress etc etc not just blaming upon technology.alone.
I have been undergoing extensive testing for 2 weeks now to find the cause of a 20 day headache with 5 migraine flair ups with nothing found in any test results. After being off work for 5 days, new medications prescribed for relief of the pain, I returned to work yesterday. Just 2 hours in, my headache returned! And, no I don't have a stressful job like you may have just been wondering.
I had my Carotid Arteries checked today by way of ultrasound and am currently awaiting for the results to come back. The technician did tell me that my brain is getting blood flow to both sides and all looked good to her but will need to wait for Cardiologist findings to rule out any plaque build up that could be causing pressure in the vessels.
After returning from the Dr's. today, I started researching flourescent light sensitivity, because I had told him the lights at work were recently changed and seemed much brighter now and when he turned the light off in the office, my squinting was much less than when they were on. What I found today was that a study was done last year that found people suffer more illnesses when exposed to flourescent lighting than incandescent lighting. Even the "mini" bulbs can put off what is referred to by scientists as "dirty" energy... almost as much as the "tube" type flourescent bulbs. When compared side by side the "mini" flourescent gave off close to 4 times the "dirty" energy that incandescent lighting put off. The GS units (dirty energy) was only 65 from the old style incandescent bulbs compared to 298 GS units from the Mini flourescent. When "dirty" energy was removed from the homes of people suffering illnesses caused or triggered by it, they showed signs of improvement, almost instantly! I myself am going back to incandescent lighting today because I feel the savings from the new bulbs could never equal the savings I will be making to my health by switching back!
It's sad that Doctors from other parts of the World are taking this problem, which affects so many individuals, more seriously than most in our own country and then chalking up complaints to vision problems, rather than reading the conclusive results found in the reports of many qualified Scientists from around the World. Patient complaints made to one's Physician should never be viewed so lightly and given a standard answer with no real explanation or research put into it first.
Just a quick Question for the Docs... Do you always give out the same answers for this type of question no matter how it's worded? I've seen several posts on this site but worded so differently and they are always given the same answer... "go see your eye doctor".
Well, I did that 6 months ago, got new glasses costing me a small fortune, and now my Dr is telling me that my glasses are probably causing yet more strain on my eyes which in turn isn't helping my migraines... Go Figure!
I have a problem that is similar, but different. I've had it since grade school, and it always happened in classrooms. Now that I work under numerous fluorescent lights (I can see about 6 from my desk) it happens every day. My problem is this: under fluorescent light I don't squint, but instead the light I perceive gets blindingly bright. So bright that I can barely focus on things and people around me. It comes and goes in waves. The light around me is not changing, but the light I perceive varies in intensity. Does anyone else have this problem?? Also, since I've started working under these lights, my eyes twitch a lot more.
So forget about damaging your eyes. See an ophthalmologist and have a complete eye examination to see if you have uncorrected refractive errors or eye disease.
If one out of four people were sensitive to florescent lighting it would have been abandoned decades ago.
JCH MD
JCH MD doesn't seem to be aware of the issue. Besides, he can't spell fluorescent... :)
Vinnie
For those who suffer as I do, there are discussions and websites out there trying to bring light to this subject if you google it. Sunglasses do help. It is embaressing to wear sunglasses to work or the grociery store, but they do help. I am looking for non-prescription, u-v protectant contacts in hopes that they will help enough to enable me to finish graduate and medical school. Good luck to all
What I learned about fluorescent light is that not only is the 60-cycling is obnoxious (yes) but that the light spectrum that it heavily requires (visible blue) which is responsible for the light's brightness and excites the retinas improving visibility - but is also fatiguing for some guaranteed. It happens. It doesn't help to deny it and doesn't let your patients feel as if you are their advocate, as I believe you are supposed to be. Or maybe ought to be.
I have had lighting engineers tell me that you have to be 40 feet away from fluroescent to not be affected by it. Was also told by these people that most lighting engineers are too lazy to do the geometry that would actually result in more appropriate placement of fluorescent fixtures. One 40-watt fluroescent tube is = to 150 watts incandescent. I asked a PG&E conservation expert, just in general, how many watts would you put overheard in an office. He said... "100, 150" and I then asked him why would you put the equivalent of 600 watts (4 tubes as was common at the time) in fluorescent installations. Not to mention spaced every few feet. Especially when you are trying to conserve energy? Why use 4X the amount of necessary overhead light. He had no answer, but got back to me and said I could not use his quote in the report I was writing.
Why indeed? Well, using only 1 40-watt tube overhead would create a sickly gray light. There has to be more used in order to create what would simulate decent lighting.
The result is excessive (for some) overhead lighting and This Is Only My Opinion, but based upon my own experience, the excessive lighting overworks the retinas (of some) which in turn overwork the eye's muscles, extending to surrounding facial muscles and into the neck as well.
Since it doesn't happen to everyone, doesn't mean it doesn't happen to some and herein lies the problem with medical "science": they only work on averages. What affects the average person and then operate from there. Unfortunately, if your diagnosis doesn't fit in with this average, they are wont to tell you it is all in your head.
Clue: I learned this in interior design. Appropriate lighting should be task specific, not glaring overhead light to accommodate a whole population. Overhead lighting should be AMBIENT, not the task.
So, Dr. Hagen, just because you don't know it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It has taken a long time since I took up this fight, but more and more and more people are realizing that fluorescent causes their headaches. There are some doctors who DO admit it.
Once I'm exposed to more than just a few minutes of fluorescent light, I will get eye pain, eye strain, and facial muscular pain. After a while, it goes to my neck as well. They ARE all connected, you see. But the eye pain, one sided, is the worst. And here is the kicker: if I am not exposed to fluorescent, I won't get any pain at all.
I do have to be careful with bright outdoor light as well, so always wear sunglasses. Always, always always. And taking care with computer use as well. But the fluorescent? Even the tiny little devil bulbs they are forcing us to use? Yes, those are also too bright for me.
Sometimes, it takes up to 4 days after exposure for the migraine to occur. So it isn't an easy, perfect little package for diagnosis. But that is what it is for me and I suspect some others as well. So have a little respect for those you diagnose as "head cases".
I certainly understand being upset about a docs non reaction to light sensativity- been there myself--if nothing else find a new doc. If your light sensativity is severe enough you will not find what you need at " supermarket" type eye centers- Full service eye clinics can usually fix you up though.
Its true that some people may be allergic to fluorescent lights,but we have to consider that millions of people all around the world uses this technology one way or another like display in computer,tv,mobile phones etc & most people are comfortable with it,so when such a sensitivity problem arise we have to look into eye problems,psychological problems like severe anxiety,stress etc etc not just blaming upon technology.alone.
I have been undergoing extensive testing for 2 weeks now to find the cause of a 20 day headache with 5 migraine flair ups with nothing found in any test results. After being off work for 5 days, new medications prescribed for relief of the pain, I returned to work yesterday. Just 2 hours in, my headache returned! And, no I don't have a stressful job like you may have just been wondering.
I had my Carotid Arteries checked today by way of ultrasound and am currently awaiting for the results to come back. The technician did tell me that my brain is getting blood flow to both sides and all looked good to her but will need to wait for Cardiologist findings to rule out any plaque build up that could be causing pressure in the vessels.
After returning from the Dr's. today, I started researching flourescent light sensitivity, because I had told him the lights at work were recently changed and seemed much brighter now and when he turned the light off in the office, my squinting was much less than when they were on. What I found today was that a study was done last year that found people suffer more illnesses when exposed to flourescent lighting than incandescent lighting. Even the "mini" bulbs can put off what is referred to by scientists as "dirty" energy... almost as much as the "tube" type flourescent bulbs. When compared side by side the "mini" flourescent gave off close to 4 times the "dirty" energy that incandescent lighting put off. The GS units (dirty energy) was only 65 from the old style incandescent bulbs compared to 298 GS units from the Mini flourescent. When "dirty" energy was removed from the homes of people suffering illnesses caused or triggered by it, they showed signs of improvement, almost instantly! I myself am going back to incandescent lighting today because I feel the savings from the new bulbs could never equal the savings I will be making to my health by switching back!
It's sad that Doctors from other parts of the World are taking this problem, which affects so many individuals, more seriously than most in our own country and then chalking up complaints to vision problems, rather than reading the conclusive results found in the reports of many qualified Scientists from around the World. Patient complaints made to one's Physician should never be viewed so lightly and given a standard answer with no real explanation or research put into it first.
Just a quick Question for the Docs... Do you always give out the same answers for this type of question no matter how it's worded? I've seen several posts on this site but worded so differently and they are always given the same answer... "go see your eye doctor".
Well, I did that 6 months ago, got new glasses costing me a small fortune, and now my Dr is telling me that my glasses are probably causing yet more strain on my eyes which in turn isn't helping my migraines... Go Figure!