People are divided about the whole oral sex is it a risk debate,but the majority say no it's not a risk & have controlled studies to back up what they say.
take it up with dr garcia...this forum is consistent of what is and isn't a risk
Dr Garcia,says every time on the freedomhealth site
Hiv risk due oral with ejaculation is 1:2500 if you swallow from a Hiv+man with a high viral load.
So a contradiction from Dr Garcia??
in the public HIV Prevention forum of MedHelp, TEAK and the other moderators maintain that oral sex in all forms is a zero risk activity. Would you agree with this assessment?
I TOTALLY AGREE / DR GARCIA
You had no risk--you are not having ARS symptoms & 6 months is wrong as an HIV window period.
You never had an exposure. Your health dept. is totally off base.
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Wow ! i should be ok? anyway the guy that did oral and scraped my penis head causing it to bleed.yesterday he went to the health department and at 8 weeks after my exposure he was HIV Neg he stated and he can prove it.Question at 8 weeks how conclusive or rely on HIV 1/2 stat pak antibodies at that time.?they say at the health dept you have to wait 6 months for conclusive results.