Rash

[aryo1985]

please help me with this question. Is it possible that red blood dots (rash) appear after 9 weeks after exposure?

[aryo1985]

Thank you for your response, it was just a question:)

[nursegirl6572]

The presence of symptoms have no relation to the testing window period, those are two totally different things.

ONCE again, you did NOT have an HIV risk, and you do NOT need testing.

Read the rules of the forum that have been posted for your review.

Now, kindly move along.

[aryo1985]

Hi to every body

I checked a lot of posts in this forum, It has been always said that the best time for testing is 3 month and it would be conclusive. It means that the window period is 3 month. so why do you always say that the symptoms of HIV appear at 2-4 weeks? whats the difference between these to period of times?

[Teak]

* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
    * After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
    * Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
    * Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.

[RainLover71]

Are you aware that most GPs/doctors know nothing about HIV at all,it's the specialist doctors like the doctors we have here in the expert doctors forum that know what they are talking about.Drs handsfield,cummings and garcia are brilliant.

[LIZZIE LOU]

your dr.'s knowledge regarding hiv is not accurate.

you had NO risk...kindly move along.

[aryo1985]

I know, is it true that appearance of symptoms can be different for different people?

[Teak]

You did not have a risk.

[aryo1985]

I did not understand, my English is not so good

[Teak]

So, It still has nothing to do with HIV.

[aryo1985]

But never I had rashes in my life

[Teak]

You never had an exposure.

[RainLover71]

My personal opinion is that he doesn't know what hes talking about.

[Teak]

Your doctor is a quack and doesn't know the first thing about HIV.

[aryo1985]

I went to Dr. He said that my rashes can be symptoms of HIV. I said to him that now it is 10 weeks after my exposure. He said that the symptoms maybe appear after 10 weeks or more. It depends on the immunity system of body. It is not the same for different people. What is your idea?

[RainLover71]

stop googling symptoms and get on with your life,you don't have HIV.

[aryo1985]

I know that I have not reasonable anxiety. But I look these rashes and get crazy. I think it is because of that I am thinking a lot about this

[LIZZIE LOU]

haha...cant take credit for that.  you can click on a name and pull up their posting history.

bottom line is that you had no risk and don't have anything to worry about.

hiv is transmitted through...
unprotected vaginal / anal intercourse
sharing iv drug works
mother to child

[aryo1985]

You have a grate memory, I have been surprised you remembered my previous posts. :)

[LIZZIE LOU]

:)

[aryo1985]

Thank you very much :)))

[LIZZIE LOU]

you never had a risk

ars comes at 2-4 weeks

red dots are not an ars rash

what more do you want?  you are NOT experiencing anything ars / or hiv related.   if you are having health concerns, see your dr...it's not a hiv concern.

[aryo1985]

rash should be with fever?

[LIZZIE LOU]

as earlier advised...you never had a risk.

red blood dots are in no way hiv related.