1. What is the general consensus about pulse rate in the cardiology community?...Still <100 bpm normal?...
2. I'm one of those people who notices his pulse when its not 72bpm....Generally speaking, are episodes of a rapid heart rate (I'm referring to rapid as being 80-100 bpm, not something very fast like 120+) mostly just an annoyance or do people need to check out each episode at an ER.....I've never had shortness of breath or fainted during an episode, ever...I hound (in a nice, tactful way though) my cardiologist about doing more testing, i had normal wcho 3 yrs ago and event monitor study revealed some atrial tachycardia but he was not concerned, but he responds in a tactful way that there is nothing more we need to do.....Maybe i'm just too anxious a person
3. On a side note, sort of an ethics question....My mom died of a PE back in Sept....She suffered cardiac arrest & was revived after 14 minutes....At first i though 14 minutes wasn't too long, but quickly found out it was actually WAY too long.....She was basically brain dead, only had very limited functions left....Based upon her wishes, i had machines turned off 4 days after her episode.....I guess my question is, do you think CPR efforts should be halted after say, no more than 5-7 minutes?....I mean, if people are revived after a long period but will need machines to survive and will never return to their normal self, perhaps its best to let them go if CPR efforts fail after a set designated time of 5-7 minutes....But i guess something like this is TOO highly controversial to set some rule in stone.....