Thanks B - however:
My three blood tests were all the Ash (not the NASH) Fibrosure - I did take the Ash Fibrosure test that is specific to alcoholic liver disease/ALD. I do also remember these:
INR is 1.1 - normal.
Albumin is 4.5 g/dl - normal.
Total Bilirubin is 0.6. - normal.
GGT is 31- normal.
Fasting Glucose - 80 - normal.
I'll locate my creatine and other test numbers and P.M. them to you.
My alcohol intake escalated to approx 8-10 fl oz of 80-proof liquor daily during the last 2-3 yrs of my drinking career. Certainly enough to wreak havoc on an already scarred liver
BTW I do recall that my A2M and Haptoglobin were both a bit deranged...as was my APO-A1. Funny that you asked specifically about those first two...was there a reason??!
" and I only went downhill from there due to drinking. "
How much were you drinking ?
ok , than I have cirrhosis too....because I ran the FibroSure before tx
and 1 year after and it came back F4 - cirrhosis. BTW my platelets
are like yours in the 200s.
The only problems is that I have been seeing Dr. Douglas Dietrich Prof.
of Medicine @ Mt. Sinai several times before and after tx. I had approx.
6 FibrosScans done there in the course of 3 years.Diagnosis F0-F1.
I showed them the FibroSure bloodmarker test and the responds was the test was no good. I have very little to no fibrosis and should enjoy life and I can drink alcohol in moderation....Dr`s orders.
They see patients coming in frequently with results from that test that are false. Mt. Sinai is a transplant center and they should know what they are talking about.
BTW what is your INR or Protime and Albumin ?
Also I am curious as to which values on your fibrosure were out of
normal range. Was it haptoglobin and alpha2macroglobulins or GGT etc?
You did the NASH-fibrosure for non-alcoholic liver disease maybe you should try the one for alcoholic liver disease ASH-fibrosure ...lol
b
Hey B - I always appreciate your imput.
Diagnosis this past year based upon the following:
A several yrs-old biopsy showed 'bridging fibrosis with septae' which is stage 3 extensive fibrosis...and I only went downhill from there due to drinking.
Three AshFibrosure tests during 2011-2012 scored .70, .68 and .71 - stunningly consistent results. It's a 100-pt test - anything under .25 is normal/minimal fibrosis. Anything over .70 is 95% probability of cirrhosis; anything over .74 is 100% probability. I think it's safe to say that I have SOME cirrhosis...just how extensive is unclear. Even a biopsy today (since it samples only1/50,000 of the liver) wouldn't tell us how extensive it is. Will be seeing the doc again in a couple of months.
I have palmar erythema. I have periodically cold hands due to diminished circulation in hands/fingers. Hope this helps to provice a clearer picture! I hope you're doing well these days. Any thoughts are always welcome.
It drives me a bit nuts that there's no edit feature! My last sentence got botched, so I will try again...
Idyllic, thanks for your input!
Regarding your first paragraph - yes, you are correct on all counts.
Other than the lab reference you gave, I've never seen one with normal adult male RBC as anything under 4.0. Here is a copy/paste:
"A normal red blood cell count will vary depending on the age and sex of the person tested. The normal number for women tends to range from about 4.2-5.4 million red blood cells per microliter (million/uL). Men have a considerably higher normal range, falling between 4.7-6 million/uL. Children tend to fall somewhere in the middle of these two, and have a very narrow normal red blood cell count range of about 4.6-4.8 million/uL"
The above certainly indicates that my current RBC of 3.8 is consistent with mild anemia. My RBC was in the 4.8 range - and then rather suddenly dropped in recent months. If you don't mind, I would be interested: what type of inaccurate diagnosis did you experience??
Idyllic, thanks for your input!
Regarding your first paragraph - yes, you are correct on all counts.
Other than the lab reference you gave, I've never seen one with normal adult male RBC as anything under 4.0. Here is a copy/paste:
"A normal red blood cell count will vary depending on the age and sex of the person tested. The normal number for women tends to range from about 4.2-5.4 million red blood cells per microliter (million/uL). Men have a considerably higher normal range, falling between 4.7-6 million/uL. Children tend to fall somewhere in the middle of these two, and have a very narrow normal red blood cell count range of about 4.6-4.8 million/uL"
The above certainly indicates that my current RBC of 3.8 is consistent with mild anemia. My RBC was in the 4.8 range - and then rather sud experience??denly dropped. If you don't mind, I would be interested: what type of inaccurate diagnosis did you experience??