Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
My sister just saw her OBGYN and she told her that her uterus was 3cm. smaller than it should be at this point of her pregnancy, she is due on February 4th. Is this a majorMajor tears Major-gesic concern?
I asked a similar question last week. I will be having my baby by c-section on Feb 3rd (actual due date is the 11th). She has been measuring 2-3 weeks ahead of schedule for the past 3 visits. From what I have found out, a smaller uterus is more of a concern, because it can possibly mean that the baby is not growing properly (due to a variety of factorsFactor ix complex such as the cord being in a knot).
In my case I am measuring large. The doctor said he is not concerned because I am scheduled for a c-section anyway, and even if she is 9 or 10 lbs, it won't matter.
I have also heard that they like to have a few consecutive measurements that are either behind or ahead of schedule before they do anything. If the doctor is concerned that there is a problem, he will order an ultrasound to find out what is going on. And at this stage, there may be nothing wrong. This is the point at which babies start to vary in weight and height.
Oh yeah, I did read one other thing. One other common cause of a low fundal height is a breech baby. However, genrally the dr. will palpitate the uterus or order an ultrasound if this is in question. And that can change over the next few weeks anyway.
I wouldn't be to concerned about it. When I was pregnant I was measuring smaller than I was supposed to the entire pregnancy, every visit they swore something was wrong. But everything was ok. I was just smaller because I was small, I gained 12 pounds the entire pregnancy. And delivered a very healthy little girls. So don't get worked up or worried about it just pray and trust the Lord!!!!!!!!!
I measured smaller than average with my first pregnancy in the last trimester. U/S showed that I was carrying her in the hammock position (sideways, not up and down) and the last week before I was due she flipped upside down on her own and was born naturally without inversion or C-Section weighing 6.9 and 20 inches long. Try not to worry prematurely as there is probably an explantion.
Fundal height is not a very reliable way to judge the growth of the baby. Dr's generally allow 2-3 cm either side of the current weeks and consider that normal. A
In my case I am measuring large. The doctor said he is not concerned because I am scheduled for a c-section anyway, and even if she is 9 or 10 lbs, it won't matter.
I have also heard that they like to have a few consecutive measurements that are either behind or ahead of schedule before they do anything. If the doctor is concerned that there is a problem, he will order an ultrasound to find out what is going on. And at this stage, there may be nothing wrong. This is the point at which babies start to vary in weight and height.
Oh yeah, I did read one other thing. One other common cause of a low fundal height is a breech baby. However, genrally the dr. will palpitate the uterus or order an ultrasound if this is in question. And that can change over the next few weeks anyway.
I am sure everything is fine.
Take care,
Amanda
Take care,
Amanda