Aa
Part Of Romney's Foreign Itinerary: Raising Money
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is on a weeklong trip in which he's scheduled to meet with three prime ministers, give two speeches and attend the opening ceremonies of the London Olympics. On a more practical level, he'll also raise some campaign cash.
This trip is designed to highlight how Romney would fix the failings he sees in President Obama's foreign policy.
Romney opened his attack Tuesday while still in the U.S. In an address to the Veterans of Foreign Wars in Reno, Nev., he lit into the Obama administration's relationship with Israel.
"Since I wouldn't venture into another country to question American foreign policy, I will tell you right here — before I leave — what I think of this administration's shabby treatment of one of our finest friends," he said.
On Sunday night in Jerusalem — scheduled in between a day of religious fasting and a day of high-level meetings — is a Romney fundraising dinner. Tickets start at $50,000 per couple.
Fundraising Abroad
"I think that there's been an incredible response to Gov. Romney's fundraiser," says Jonny Daniels, an Israeli political consultant with close ties to the Republican Party. "I know dozens of people that are flying out to Israel from the United States, literally for a few days, just to be in Israel when the governor's there."
He says the travelers include leaders of the Republican Jewish Coalition and other members of the GOP elite.
"Which, in fact, in terms of what Gov. Romney's doing, strengthens his ties with these people," Daniels says. "Enables them to be with him not just for a fundraiser, but to be with him in a day in a place that they call home."
The Jerusalem event comes after Romney holds a pair of fundraisers in London on Thursday — a reception priced at $2,500 per person and a dinner costing $25,000 and up. Both are aimed at donors in the banking industry.
There's a little awkwardness involved. Originally, Barclays CEO Bob Diamond was going to be one of the hosts. But since then, the bank has paid $450 million in fines to settle charges that it rigged the LIBOR, the rate that international banks charge for short-term loans to one another. The bank faces a criminal investigation in England, and Diamond has resigned as CEO.
Still, another of Romney's fundraising hosts is Patrick Durkin, the top lobbyist in Barclays' U.S. operation. He's also a Romney campaign bundler — a solicitor of contributions.
The nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics says Durkin has previously raised more than $1 million.
Durkin and the Romney campaign both declined comment for this story.
Americans Overseas
Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, a liberal group that criticizes big money in politics, says Romney "is obviously raising huge sums of money from across the country and apparently from across the world, but he is focusing very heavily on the Wall Street sector."
Weissman says neither candidate nor donors seem deterred by the LIBOR scandal or other problems that have rolled through the financial sector.
"So I suppose it's no worse to be doing that in London than it is to be doing it in New York, but it's a sad state of affairs," he says.
Now, all of these events are raising money from American citizens and permanent residents.
"Best estimates are that there are 6 [million] or 7 million American citizens who live outside the U.S.," says Rob Carolina, chairman of Democrats Abroad United Kingdom.
He points out that it's illegal to solicit political money from anyone who isn't a citizen or a green-card holder. And he says the law is taken seriously.
"I'm typically asked to produce my passport at the time a contribution is made. Or alternatively, if a contribution is made online, it's become commonplace to ask people to scan and submit a copy of their passport for records," he says.
Carolina says Americans overseas are often eager to do more in politics than just vote.
And as campaign budgets keep pushing upward, politicians from would-be congressmen to would-be presidents are looking overseas — especially to London.
In the last presidential campaign, the visitors to London included Republican Rudolph Giuliani, Democrat Dennis Kucinich, former President Clinton and future first lady Michelle Obama.
Two weeks ago, the Obama campaign held a $250-per-person reception. And last July, Romney attended a reception in London that records indicate grossed about $73,000.
http://www.npr.org/2012/07/25/157381528/part-of-romneys-foreign-itinerary-raising-money
This trip is designed to highlight how Romney would fix the failings he sees in President Obama's foreign policy.
Romney opened his attack Tuesday while still in the U.S. In an address to the Veterans of Foreign Wars in Reno, Nev., he lit into the Obama administration's relationship with Israel.
"Since I wouldn't venture into another country to question American foreign policy, I will tell you right here — before I leave — what I think of this administration's shabby treatment of one of our finest friends," he said.
On Sunday night in Jerusalem — scheduled in between a day of religious fasting and a day of high-level meetings — is a Romney fundraising dinner. Tickets start at $50,000 per couple.
Fundraising Abroad
"I think that there's been an incredible response to Gov. Romney's fundraiser," says Jonny Daniels, an Israeli political consultant with close ties to the Republican Party. "I know dozens of people that are flying out to Israel from the United States, literally for a few days, just to be in Israel when the governor's there."
He says the travelers include leaders of the Republican Jewish Coalition and other members of the GOP elite.
"Which, in fact, in terms of what Gov. Romney's doing, strengthens his ties with these people," Daniels says. "Enables them to be with him not just for a fundraiser, but to be with him in a day in a place that they call home."
The Jerusalem event comes after Romney holds a pair of fundraisers in London on Thursday — a reception priced at $2,500 per person and a dinner costing $25,000 and up. Both are aimed at donors in the banking industry.
There's a little awkwardness involved. Originally, Barclays CEO Bob Diamond was going to be one of the hosts. But since then, the bank has paid $450 million in fines to settle charges that it rigged the LIBOR, the rate that international banks charge for short-term loans to one another. The bank faces a criminal investigation in England, and Diamond has resigned as CEO.
Still, another of Romney's fundraising hosts is Patrick Durkin, the top lobbyist in Barclays' U.S. operation. He's also a Romney campaign bundler — a solicitor of contributions.
The nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics says Durkin has previously raised more than $1 million.
Durkin and the Romney campaign both declined comment for this story.
Americans Overseas
Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, a liberal group that criticizes big money in politics, says Romney "is obviously raising huge sums of money from across the country and apparently from across the world, but he is focusing very heavily on the Wall Street sector."
Weissman says neither candidate nor donors seem deterred by the LIBOR scandal or other problems that have rolled through the financial sector.
"So I suppose it's no worse to be doing that in London than it is to be doing it in New York, but it's a sad state of affairs," he says.
Now, all of these events are raising money from American citizens and permanent residents.
"Best estimates are that there are 6 [million] or 7 million American citizens who live outside the U.S.," says Rob Carolina, chairman of Democrats Abroad United Kingdom.
He points out that it's illegal to solicit political money from anyone who isn't a citizen or a green-card holder. And he says the law is taken seriously.
"I'm typically asked to produce my passport at the time a contribution is made. Or alternatively, if a contribution is made online, it's become commonplace to ask people to scan and submit a copy of their passport for records," he says.
Carolina says Americans overseas are often eager to do more in politics than just vote.
And as campaign budgets keep pushing upward, politicians from would-be congressmen to would-be presidents are looking overseas — especially to London.
In the last presidential campaign, the visitors to London included Republican Rudolph Giuliani, Democrat Dennis Kucinich, former President Clinton and future first lady Michelle Obama.
Two weeks ago, the Obama campaign held a $250-per-person reception. And last July, Romney attended a reception in London that records indicate grossed about $73,000.
http://www.npr.org/2012/07/25/157381528/part-of-romneys-foreign-itinerary-raising-money
You having a "higher opinion" of the President is probably an accurate statement. Truth be told, I hold the President on a high shelf than I do Romney.... not only now but before we got to this point.
I do compare the two individuals to the common explosives C4 and TNT. Either way we go, were probably going to blow up.... the question is how bad and are there any controls in place to protect against collateral damage? ....... boy, I sure hope so.
I do compare the two individuals to the common explosives C4 and TNT. Either way we go, were probably going to blow up.... the question is how bad and are there any controls in place to protect against collateral damage? ....... boy, I sure hope so.
Hear hear!! lol
I am politically naive.For the most part I have avoided politics and therefore am generally uncomfortable speaking about issues I really haven't educated myself on. I think hashing this about is good. It makes me really go beyond my initial gut response.
I want to clarify that my criticism of Obama is related to just a few issues quite dear to me but I do think he has done well during a difficult time.
Obama has, in my opinion followed through on important issues. He brought us healthcare legislation, kept up the war against terrorism (got Bin Laden!) eliminated the "Don't ask, Don't tell "policy and has supported the rights of women worldwide. He has been disappointment, but he has also come through for us.
I don't know who I will vote for but I do want to be clear that I do not believe he the antichrist, so to speak. :D
I want to clarify that my criticism of Obama is related to just a few issues quite dear to me but I do think he has done well during a difficult time.
Obama has, in my opinion followed through on important issues. He brought us healthcare legislation, kept up the war against terrorism (got Bin Laden!) eliminated the "Don't ask, Don't tell "policy and has supported the rights of women worldwide. He has been disappointment, but he has also come through for us.
I don't know who I will vote for but I do want to be clear that I do not believe he the antichrist, so to speak. :D
Apparently I have a higher opinion of Obama than you do. I too am disappointed in several aspects of his presidency but overall I think Romney is simply too dangerous to consider seriously.
By the minute if you ask me.
Was Romney led into answering the question? Doesn't matter I guess. Little points like "who is the best speaker" spark very little interest with me. Politicians talk all damned day, so they should be pretty good at it.
At times they speak to an empty room. other times they lie through their teeth with the entire country watching.
I'd prefer to find someone who will do what they say. If I heard 1 politician say, "I bring absolutely nothing to the table", I'd give the guy a little respect.
Talk is cheap and getting cheaper by the day if you ask me.
At times they speak to an empty room. other times they lie through their teeth with the entire country watching.
I'd prefer to find someone who will do what they say. If I heard 1 politician say, "I bring absolutely nothing to the table", I'd give the guy a little respect.
Talk is cheap and getting cheaper by the day if you ask me.
I wasn't referring so much to their skills at debate (though I did love listening to Clinton) but where they truly stand on issues dear to me. I don't really know if either of them stand true on anything.
Feeling very cynical.
Feeling very cynical.
When the two of them debate we'll get a better idea of who is the better speaker. My impression at this point is that Obama will prove to be better in all respects - except perhaps ideology, depending on your political persuasion... but time will tell.
Romney was making a stand to support the conservative Jewish view of Jerusalem as Israel's capital.
It is controversial and he shows himself to be a lousy statesman for his lack of diplomacy once again.
I resent having to choose from either of these men.Romney represents everything I abhor in terms of big business. He seems to me to be arrogant, callous and out of touch with regular folk.
Obama speaks and I don't cringe at his words, but his actions are often disappointing to me.He is a disappointment.
I am aware that there are issues to be addressed in terms of the Middle East. I embrace all peoples and I know that Israel, like America is not perfect. Having said that and knowing that Romney is a big phony and when he says Jerusalem is Israel's capital, he opens this Italian Jew's heart.
Of course, that is what he is banking on and fortunately I don't have a sheckel to spare him.
It is controversial and he shows himself to be a lousy statesman for his lack of diplomacy once again.
I resent having to choose from either of these men.Romney represents everything I abhor in terms of big business. He seems to me to be arrogant, callous and out of touch with regular folk.
Obama speaks and I don't cringe at his words, but his actions are often disappointing to me.He is a disappointment.
I am aware that there are issues to be addressed in terms of the Middle East. I embrace all peoples and I know that Israel, like America is not perfect. Having said that and knowing that Romney is a big phony and when he says Jerusalem is Israel's capital, he opens this Italian Jew's heart.
Of course, that is what he is banking on and fortunately I don't have a sheckel to spare him.
Point taken.
And his "... I'm not sure if London is prepared for the Olympics..." comment (or whatever it is that he said), isn't really painting him as a model of diplomacy either.
I get what you're saying, Michael, and I'll agree that he's had a few 'misspeaks', but I still think that he's a FAR better and more accurate speaker than our sitting President.
Off-teleprompter, President Obama leaves much to be desired.
I don't want to start identifying specific instances of President Obama's flubs, as we've all heard about them, ad nauseum, and this article is about Romney, not President Obama.
And his "... I'm not sure if London is prepared for the Olympics..." comment (or whatever it is that he said), isn't really painting him as a model of diplomacy either.
I get what you're saying, Michael, and I'll agree that he's had a few 'misspeaks', but I still think that he's a FAR better and more accurate speaker than our sitting President.
Off-teleprompter, President Obama leaves much to be desired.
I don't want to start identifying specific instances of President Obama's flubs, as we've all heard about them, ad nauseum, and this article is about Romney, not President Obama.
Israelis and Palestinians both claim rights to Jerusalem and I think it is safe to say that it is a very controversial issue. So why mention it - why focus on it? And why characterize Israel as "the start-up nation"? I just don't get him at all some times - too many times.
I question his diplomacy.
I question his diplomacy.
I am not following this discussion...?
"Israel's financial centre is Tel Aviv,[18] while Jerusalem is the country's most populous city, and its capital (although not recognized internationally as such)." SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel
Not sure what "He did it again" means, but it sounds accurate to me.
Not sure what "He did it again" means, but it sounds accurate to me.
Yeah, right.
Let's see if he remembers how many states there are in the US.
Mitt Romney: Jerusalem Is 'The Capital Of Israel' Mitt Romney:
Agree with you both.
War is making a few people an awful lot of money. These are the same folks backing both candidates and probably even selling weapons to both sides.
Am I ever getting jaded !
Am I ever getting jaded !
Unless sanctions can cripple a nation, it seems as if they don't work so well. Humanitarian efforts disallow crippling sanctions, so you get what we have here.
I have no opinion on this matter. If a war breaks out, I know we will end up in it and I am tired of people blaming one President for wars and excusing another. That can't be the way it works unless you are very much in it for the partisan politics that most here say they are against.
I have no opinion on this matter. If a war breaks out, I know we will end up in it and I am tired of people blaming one President for wars and excusing another. That can't be the way it works unless you are very much in it for the partisan politics that most here say they are against.
Mitt Romney would 'respect' Israel strike on Iran, aide says
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/07/29/13016589-mitt-romney-would-respect-israel-strike-on-iran-aide-says?lite
JERUSALEM - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney would “respect” Israel if it were to decide it had to use military force to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, a senior aide said on Sunday.
"If Israel has to take action on its own, in order to stop Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect that decision," Romney's senior national security aide Dan Senor told reporters traveling with the candidate.
The comment, made ahead of Romney's planned meetings in Jerusalem with Israeli leaders, seemed to differ with President Barack Obama's attempts to convince Israel to avoid any preemptive attack.
Gov. Romney’s first meeting was Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who greeted him as a “personal friend and friend of Israel.”
Shaking hands underneath U.S. and Israel flags, the pair signaled that Iran would be top of the agenda in their discussions.
Netanyahu said: "We have to be honest and say that all the sanctions and diplomacy so far have not set back the Iranian program by one iota. And that's why I believe that we need a strong and credible military threat coupled with the sanctions to have a chance to change that situation."
Sunday’s comments came as a senior Israeli official denied a newspaper report that President Barack Obama's national security adviser had briefed Netanyahu on a U.S. contingency plan to attack Iran should diplomacy fail to curb its nuclear program.
The Israeli liberal Haaretz daily on Sunday quoted an unnamed U.S. official as saying the adviser, Thomas Donilon, had described the plan over dinner with Netanyahu earlier this month.
"Nothing in the article is correct. Donilon did not meet the prime minister for dinner, he did not meet him one-on-one, nor did he present operational plans to attack Iran," the senior official, who declined to be named given the sensitivity of the issue, told Reuters."
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/07/29/13016589-mitt-romney-would-respect-israel-strike-on-iran-aide-says?lite
JERUSALEM - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney would “respect” Israel if it were to decide it had to use military force to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, a senior aide said on Sunday.
"If Israel has to take action on its own, in order to stop Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect that decision," Romney's senior national security aide Dan Senor told reporters traveling with the candidate.
The comment, made ahead of Romney's planned meetings in Jerusalem with Israeli leaders, seemed to differ with President Barack Obama's attempts to convince Israel to avoid any preemptive attack.
Gov. Romney’s first meeting was Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who greeted him as a “personal friend and friend of Israel.”
Shaking hands underneath U.S. and Israel flags, the pair signaled that Iran would be top of the agenda in their discussions.
Netanyahu said: "We have to be honest and say that all the sanctions and diplomacy so far have not set back the Iranian program by one iota. And that's why I believe that we need a strong and credible military threat coupled with the sanctions to have a chance to change that situation."
Sunday’s comments came as a senior Israeli official denied a newspaper report that President Barack Obama's national security adviser had briefed Netanyahu on a U.S. contingency plan to attack Iran should diplomacy fail to curb its nuclear program.
The Israeli liberal Haaretz daily on Sunday quoted an unnamed U.S. official as saying the adviser, Thomas Donilon, had described the plan over dinner with Netanyahu earlier this month.
"Nothing in the article is correct. Donilon did not meet the prime minister for dinner, he did not meet him one-on-one, nor did he present operational plans to attack Iran," the senior official, who declined to be named given the sensitivity of the issue, told Reuters."
I'm cannot comment as to whether or not it's ok for Presidential candidates to actually take money from other countries, but it sure makes sense to me that foreign countries would donate to Presidential candidates campaigns. The US is unique in that it is the worlds biggest super power right now. You are always going to have a huge interest from outside the US as to who becomes President. Your election impacts all of us outside the US, it's just the way it is. Your economic situation has a huge impact on all of us. Frankly, everything you do touches us. So I can sure see how and why this happens. I doubt any other country watches our election or many other countries, but the whole world watches the US elections. Heck, I think it gets more media coverage in Canada then our own Federal elections do. I sure know I watch with interest (and sometimes worry).
I am not comfortable with either party fund raising out of the U.S.
However, I am certainly more comfortable with a candidate taking money from Israel rather than from the Saudis.
Israel is an ally and the only democracy in the Middle East (along with Jordan) and while I still don't believe either candidate should be begging from any other country, better to be obliged to friends than enemies.
However, I am certainly more comfortable with a candidate taking money from Israel rather than from the Saudis.
Israel is an ally and the only democracy in the Middle East (along with Jordan) and while I still don't believe either candidate should be begging from any other country, better to be obliged to friends than enemies.
"Since I wouldn't venture into another country to question American foreign policy......."
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/28/13001202-romney-looks-for-political-lift-in-israel-after-london-miscues?lite
"...in an interview with the Israeli newspaper Hayom (owned by conservative mega-donor Sheldon Adelson), Romney ripped the president for various elements of his policy toward Israel..."
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/28/13001202-romney-looks-for-political-lift-in-israel-after-london-miscues?lite
"...in an interview with the Israeli newspaper Hayom (owned by conservative mega-donor Sheldon Adelson), Romney ripped the president for various elements of his policy toward Israel..."
Personally, I am much more interested in what the Israelis think about the ramen noodle. That's going to be real exciting and may sway my vote.
You must join this user group in order to participate in this discussion.
You are reading content posted in the Current Events . . . Group
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
