no problem, I stink at online communication lol
okay sorry..miscommunication ....
The first part of the article says "Muslims and Coptic Christians Clash Again in Egypt" which to me sounds like they were both fighting. Then I read a small group of Muslims had fired shots at the sit in. (sounds like the muslims were the aggressive ones)
Then it says With memories of last month’s church fire still fresh, about 500 Copts rallied to defend their church — some with firearms — even before more than two dozen Muslims had approached it. Casualties were roughly even on both sides.
The copts rallied to (DEFEND) their church (2 doz muslims had approached it) Again, the muslims are the aggressive ones here.
My point is in the article its pretty clear that the muslims were the aggressive ones, so why does the title say (muslims and coptic christians clash). Thats not clashing. Thats one group of people attacking another group. Its criminal.
bb there is so much up there I doubt you will not find it, I have googled its all about the churches and the burning and the killings .what do you mean you like how the 'story' says they are both fighting ..as for getting it right as I say its all there with plenty of info .?????
Ok, I found a site finally. I love how the story says they are both fighting, yet the christians were doing a (sit-in) when muslims fired on them.
"Witnesses and officials said a small group of Muslims had fired shots at the sit-in."
Be nice if they got the story right. So I wonder if this means the chrisitans did nothing to fight and they were just attacked or what? The story appears to be all over the place with the exception of the above quote.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/16/world/middleeast/16egypt.html?_r=1
I can not get the link to work.
World's ending tomorrow at 6:00pm, so I'm not too sure what all you guys are worried about.
I'm actually out spending my life-savings as we speak!
Just bought a new car and a new TV and a new wardrobe... oh wait, damn.
well if you go to the search engine you will find a ton about it but heres one I hope it works english.reuters.com/article/2011/05/15/uk-egypt-christians...
I missed that story (Coptic church)--can you give us a link?
I think a lot of us expected him to sell out Israel ... his heart isnt in it he has shown it many times.,where his beliefs lie .. I expect many countries like Iran/Egypt to come out to praise him why are we sending $billions we dont have to the Mid east like Egypt PS did anyone notice that news about the Coptic Church burnt down and Christians killed ..naww course not why would anyone notice or care about that ...
I know, and besides the David Wilkerson warning of terrible things coming to the US, there are others having visions and dreams of us having so many "natural" disasters that we are invaded by an enemy when we are vulnerable. Nothing is looking good for our country. Our country use to be protected by God. When God removes that vale, we are in serious trouble. Its very scary. We can pray though.
I read this earlier today and it definitely concerns me! I can't see any good coming from our president choosing to not back Israel.
Genesis 12:1-3, Zechariah 12, and Joel 3:2...give a few of many, many prophetic Bible verses of the consequences of not supporting Israel.