Newt Gingrich: Romney Flip-Flopped On Tax Cuts

[teko]

Newt Gingrich called out Mitt Romney on Sunday for backing off his promise to cut taxes on the wealthy after winning the Republican nomination.

“I think it’s clear he changed,” Gingrich said on NBC’s “Meet The Press” roundtable, admitting that Romney had shifted from wanting to lower taxes on all Americans to promising that his reform plan would not lower taxes paid by the wealthy.

Romney’s pledge is to cut tax rates across the board by 20 percent and recover the lost revenue by closing unnamed credits and deductions for high income earners. The net effect, he says, would be to lower the burden on the middle class and keep effective taxes constant on the rich without increasing the deficit — goals that nonpartisan experts deem mathematically infeasible.

In February, during a GOP primary debate, Romney said, “We’re going to cut taxes on everyone across the country by 20 percent, including the top 1 percent.”

On Wednesday, facing down President Obama, he insisted, “I will not reduce the taxes paid by high-income Americans.”

Gingrich said Romney’s inconsistency was “good politics” but violates a conservative belief. “What he said is something that, frankly, true supply-siders don’t necessarily love, but it’s good politics — he said, ‘I will close enough deductions that wealthy Americans will not get a net tax cut,’” the former House speaker said. (Video below via Think Progress.)


The former governor’s shift came amid a concerted effort by the Obama campaign to paint him as someone who would help the wealthy at the expense of the middle class. It’s one of several examples from Wednesday night’s debate in which Romney painted himself as a friend to working Americans. Conservatives had been initially hypercritical of Romney’s pivots to the left — particularly when it comes to ‘Romneycare’ — but in recent weeks, amid troubles for his campaign, have refrained from criticizing his pivots on taxes and health care.

That gives Romney’s surrogates more operating room to make a case for their candidate.

“First of all, Governor Romney made it clear in the debate,” said Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) on Fox News Sunday, “that he is not going to lower the burden on upper income individuals. We all know, Chris, that upper income individuals rely more heavily on deductions.”

Ayotte defended Romney’s refusal to identify any tax credits or deductions he would eliminate, arguing that he would sort that out with Congress after he’s elected.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/newt-gingrich-romney-changed-on-taxes.php

[mikesimon]

etch a sketch again and again and again.......etc.

[brice1967]

Well, flip flopped or evolved... whatever you want to call it.  Guess what?  Before its all said and done, I bet he does it again.  The President may even "come around" on a few things.  It happens all of the time and desperate times call for desperate measures.

Counting the last election and this one, I've never seen politicians change their minds so much.  I could tolerate one changing ones own opinion if it weren't happening, at will.

This and all of the finger pointing.  It looks like a giant group of over paid kindergarteners with the exception of kindergarteners usually are not so whiny about it....  My theory on aging seems to be holding some water.  I think we mature at a certain age, then we start going backwards.  With these people, it happens when they run for office or get elected to office.