Hey all, Thanks very much for your quick and thoughtful responses. To Lizzy I am sorry but I did not see your previous post. I think I caN BREATHE again. Once more THANKS TO ALL of YOU.
dont hijack other ppl's posts ! ! ! you have been assessed as having NO risk. kindly move on
Symptoms make no difference No risk means No risk
Oral sex carries no risk for HIV infection - You were never at risk and do not need testing
You can get a conclusive result even before the oral sex happened because oral sex is not a risk.
just posted this on another thread...please read the forum, as it is full of posts regarding oral sex
There is no debate (among experts) about the HIV risks associated with oral sex. The risk is so low that almost nobody who cares for HIV infected patients has ever had a patient believed to have been infected that way. Among experts, it's a semantic issue about using terms like "no risk" and "very low risk". There is no difference between my or Dr. Hook's use of "low risk" and other experts' "no risk".
DR. HANSFIELD
"And oral sex is basically safe sex -- completely safe with respect to HIV and although not zero risk for other STDs, the chance of infection is far lower than for unprotected vaginal or anal sex. Please educate yourself about the real risks. If you stick with oral sex and condom-protected vaginal or anal sex, you have no HIV worries and very little worry about other STDs. " DR HANSFIELD
"I am sure you can find lots of people who belive that HIV is transmitted by oral sex, but you will not find scientific data to support this unrealistic concern..." DR HOOK
"HIV is not spread by touching, masturbation, oral sex or condom protected sex."- DR. HOOK
in the public HIV Prevention forum of MedHelp, TEAK and the other moderators maintain that oral sex in all forms is a zero risk activity. Would you agree with this assessment?
I TOTALLY AGREE / DR GARCIA
The observation on thousand and thousand of observations is that HIV is not spread by oral sex (of any sort). DR. HOOK